Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T04:30:21.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and risk factors of postnatal depression among women attending antenatal courses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Daniele Piacentini*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio (Bergamo)
Daniela Leveni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio (Bergamo)
Giuseppe Primerano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio (Bergamo)
Marina Cattaneo
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio (Bergamo)
Loredana Volpi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio (Bergamo)
Giuseppe Biffi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Azienda Ospedaliera di Treviglio, Treviglio (Bergamo)
Fiorino Mirabella
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. D. Piacentini, Ambulatorio Psico Sociale, Viale Martiri della Libertà 6, 24019 Zogno (Bergamo). Fax: +39-0345-52030 E-mail: daniele.piacentini@tin.it

Summary

Aims – Postnatal depression, the most frequent complication occurring after pregnancy, is often not recognized. The prevalence of postnatal depression is currently considered to be 10–15% in western countries. A wide range of risk factors related to postnatal depression were researched in international studies. Our aim was to evaluate the risk factors and their frequency in a women population of Bergamo Province and compare the results with findings of international literature. Methods – 595 women taking part to antenatal courses in three hospitals in Bergamo Province were screened for Postnatal Depression using EPDS and clinical interview. Prevalence and possible psychosocial risk factors data were collected and subsequently analysed and compared with literature findings. Results – Thirty six (7.1%) women of our sample had postnatal depression. Depressed mood and depression during pregnancy, anxiety during pregnancy, poor social support, recent life events, a history of depression or other psychiatric history, presence of maternity blues were the strongest predictors of postnatal depression in our sample. Conclusions – The Psychosocial risk factors emerged from our study are substantially the same indicated by international studies, on the contrary prevalence is a little lower. This result may be explained considering that our women sample wasn't completely representative of general population.

Declaration of Interest: Results of this study are part of a project, “Identification and early treatment of post partum depression”, approved and financially supported by Regione Lombardia. This study didn't receive grants or support from drug companies. There are no conflicts of interest.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agostini, F., Monti, F., Marano, G. & Lupi, F. (2005). L’Edimburgh postnatal depression scale a 3, 9, 18 mesi dopo il parto. Psychofenia: Ricerca e Analisi Psicologica 1, 6378.Google Scholar
Beck, C.T. (1996). A meta-analysis of predictors of postpartum depression. Nursing Research 45, 297303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, M., Rotemberg, N., Koren, D. & Klein, E. (2005). Risk factors for early post partum depressive symptoms. General Hospital Psychiatry 28, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buist, A., Speelman, C., Hayes, B., Reay, R, Milgrom, J., Meyer, D. & Condon, J. (2007). Impact of education on women with perinatal depression. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 28, 4954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buist, A.E., Austin, M.P., Hayes, B.A., Speelman, C., Bilszta, J.L., Gemmill, A.W., Brooks, J., Ellwood, D. & Milgrom, J. (2008). Postnatal mental health of women giving birth in Australia 2002–2004: findings from the beyondblue National Postnatal Depression Program. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42, 6673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpiniello, B., Parlante, C.M., Serri, F., Costa, G. & Carta, M.G. (1997) Validation of the Edimburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Italy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 18, 280285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrol, H., Coroner, N., Rusibane, S. & Séjourné, N. (2007). A pilot study of prevention of postpartum blues. Gynècologie Obstètrique & Fertilitè 35, 12421244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical Evidence, Sesta edizione italiana (2008). Retrieved January 26, 2008, from http://aifa.clinev.it/Google Scholar
Dennis, C.L. (2004). Influence of depressive symptomatology on maternal health service utilization and general health. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 7, 183191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J., Heron, J. & Francomb, H. (2001). Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth. British Medical Journal 323, 257260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavin, N.I., Gaynes, B.N. & Lohr, K.N. (2005). Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstetrics and Gynecology 106, 10711083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halbreich, U. & Karkun, S. (2006). Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders 91, 97111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K. & Spitzer, R. (2002). The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatrics Annals 32, 509515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, A., Morris, K.M., Turner, K.M. & Barry, S. (1997). Postnatal depression and elation among mothers and their partners: Prevalence and predictors. British Journal of Psychiatry 171, 550555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, B. & Milgrom, J. (2008). Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress. BMC Psychiatry 16, 824.Google Scholar
Matthey, S., Henshaw, C., Elliott, S. & Barnett, B. (2006). Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edimburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice. Archives Womens Mental Health 9, 309315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, J., Eriksen, J., Negri, L. & Gemmill, A.W. (2005). Screening for post natal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edimburgh Depression Scale in an australian sample. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 39, 833839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, J., Gemmil, A.W., Bilszta, J.L., Hayes, B., Barnett, B., Brooks, J., Ericksen, J., Ellwood, D. & Buist, A. (2008). Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: a large prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders 108, 147157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2007). Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health. The Nice Guideline on Clinical Management and Service Guidance. Retrieved January 26, 2009, from http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG45Google Scholar
O’Hara, M.W. & Swain, A.M. (1996). Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta analysis. International Review of Psychiatry 8, 3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, R. (1993). Postnatal depression. Lancet 341, 1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, E., Grace, S. & Wallington, T. (2004). Antenatal risk factors for post partum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. General Hospital Psychiatry 26, 289295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, D.V., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett, Sheehan K., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Bonora, L.I., Keskiner, A., Schinka, J., Knapp, E., Sheehan, M.F. & Dunbar, G.C. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID. European Psychiatry 12, 232241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesga, Lopez O., Blanco, C., Keyes, K., Olfson, M., Grant, B.F. & Hasin, D.S. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry 65, 805815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar