Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T13:20:48.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of treadmill inclination and speed on forelimb muscle activity and kinematics in the horse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Emma Hodson-Tole
Emma Hodson-Tole*
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, Hartpury, Gloucestershire GL19 3BE, UK
*
*etole@rvc.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effect of speed and incline on EMG activity in the brachiocephalicus muscle and the long and lateral heads of the triceps brachii muscle. Six horses were exercised on a treadmill at walk (1.7 m s-1), trot (4.0 m s-1) and right lead canter (7.2 m s-1) on a 0 and 8% incline. Kinematics (120 Hz) and electromyography (EMG) (2000 Hz) data were collected simultaneously from the left forelimb of each horse. Significant differences in relation to velocity and incline were identified using two-way ANOVA and post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls tests (P≪0.05). The degree of association between timing of peak EMG intensity and the timing of maximum protraction/retraction angles was assessed using ANCOVA. Increases in velocity led to an increase in stride length and reduction in stride duration. Exercise on the incline increased stance duration and decreased swing duration, while limb protraction/retraction increased. The time of peak EMG activity in the brachiocephalicus was highly related to time of maximum limb retraction (r2=0.84). The time of peak EMG activity in the long head of the triceps brachii was highly associated with time of maximum limb protraction (r2=0.87). Increases in velocity and incline both caused an increase in the intensity of the EMG signal from each muscle. Duration of EMG activity was prolonged in the long head of the triceps brachii muscle and in the brachiocephalicus muscle as velocity increased. Treadmill speed and slope therefore both alter the workload placed on forelimb muscles.

Keywords

electromyographyhorseslocomotionforelimb muscles
Type
Research Article
Information
Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , May 2006 , pp. 61 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan, M, Barneveld, A and Schamhardt, HC (1997). Effects of treadmill inclination on kinematics of the trot in Dutch Warmblood horses. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 23: 71–75.Google Scholar
2Barrey, E, Galloux, P, Vallette, JP, Auvinet, B and Wolter, R (1993). Stride characteristics of overground versus treadmill locomotion in the saddle horse. Acta Anatomica 146: 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Kai, M, Hiraga, A, Kubo, K and Tokuriki, M (1997). Comparison of stride characteristics in a cantering horse on a flat and inclined treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 23: 76–79.Google Scholar
4Hoyt, DF, Molinar, M, Wickler, SJ and Cogger, EA (2002). Effect of trotting speed, load and incline on hindlimb stance-phase kinematics. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 34: 330–336.Google Scholar
5Robert, C, Valettte, JP, Pourcelot, P, Audigie, F and Denoix, JM (2002). Effects of trotting speed on muscle activity and kinematics in saddlehorses. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 34: 295–301.Google Scholar
6Wickler, SJ, Hoyt, DF, Biewener, AA, Cogger, EA and De La Paz, KL (2005). In vivo muscle function vs speed II. Muscle function trotting up an incline. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1191–1200.Google Scholar
7Hodson, E, Clayton, HM and Lanovaz, JL (2000). The FL in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces. Equine Veterinary Journal 32: 287–294.Google Scholar
8Tokuriki, M, Aoki, O, Niki, Y, Kurakawa, Y, Hataya, M and Kita, T (1989). Electromyographic activity of cubital joint muscles in horses during locomotion. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50: 950–957.Google Scholar
9Wilson, AM, Watson, JC and Lichtwark, GA (2003). A catapult action for rapid limb protraction. Nature 421: 35–36.Google Scholar
10Ryan, JM, Cobb, MA and Hermanson, JW (1992). Elbow extensor muscles of the horse: Postural and dynamic implications. Acta Anatomica 144: 71–79.Google Scholar
11Schumann, NP, Biedermann, FHW, Kleine, BU, Stegeman, DF, Roeleveld, K, Hackert, R and Scholle, HC (2002). Multi-channel EMG of the M. triceps brachii in rats during treadmill locomotion. Clinical Neurophysiology 113: 1142–1151.Google Scholar
12Snow, DH and Guy, PS (1980). Muscle fibre type composition of a number of limb muscles in different types of horse. Research in Veterinary Science 28: 137–144.Google Scholar
13Tokuriki, M and Aoki, O (1991). Neck muscles activity in horses during locomotion with and without a rider. Equine Exercise Physiology 3: 146–150.Google Scholar
14Tokuriki, M, Ohtsuki, R, Kai, M, Hiraga, A, Oki, H, Miyahara, Y and Aoki, O (1999). EMG activity of the muscles of the neck and forelimbs during different forms of locomotion. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 30: 231–234.Google Scholar
15Robert, C, Valette, JP and Denoix, JM (2000). The effects of treadmill inclination and speed on the activity of two hindlimb muscles in the trotting horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 32: 312–317.Google Scholar
16Robert, C, Valette, JP and Denoix, JM (2001). The effects of treadmill inclination and speed on the activity of three trunk muscles in the trotting horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 33: 466–472.Google Scholar
17von Tscharner, V (2000). Intensity analysis in time-frequency space of surface myoelectric signals by avelets of specified resolution. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 10: 433–445.Google Scholar
18Wakeling, JM, Kaya, M, Temple, GK, Johnston, IA and Herzog, W (2002). Determining patterns of motor recruitment during locomotion. The Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 359–369.Google Scholar
19Von Tscharner, V (2002). Time-frequency and principal-component methods for the analysis of EMGs recorded during a mildly fatiguing exercise on a cycle ergometer. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 12: 479–492.Google Scholar
20Back, W, Schamhardt, HC and Barneveld, A (1996). Are kinematics of the walk related to locomotion of a Warmblood horse at the trot? Veterinary Quarterly 18: S79–S84.Google Scholar
21Van Weeren, PR, van den Bogert, AJ and Barneveld, A (1992). Correction models for skin displacement in equine kinematics gait analysis. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 12: 178–192.Google Scholar
22Barrey, E, Deslins, F, Poirel, D, Biau, S, Lemaire, S, Rivero, JLL and Langlois, B (2002). Early evaluation of dressage ability in different breeds. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 34: 319–324.Google Scholar
23McGuigan, PM and Wilson, AM (2003). The effect of gait and digital muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse equus caballus. Journal of Experimental Biology 206: 1325–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Askew, GN and Marsh, RL (1998). Optimal shortening velocity (V/V max ) of skeletal muscle during cyclical conditions: Length force effects and velocity dependent activation and deactivation. The Journal of Experimental Biology 201: 1527–1540.Google Scholar
25Hoyt, DF, Wickler, SJ, Biewener, AA, Cogger, EA and De La Paz, KL (2005). In vivo muscle function vs speed I. Muscle strain in relation to length change of the muscle tendon-unit. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1175–1190.Google Scholar
26Merkens, HW, Schamhardt, HC, Hartman, W and Kersjes, AW (1986). Ground reaction force patterns of Dutch Warmblood horses at normal walk. Equine Veterinary Journal 18: 207–214.Google Scholar
27Schamhardt, HC, Merkens, HW and Osch, GJVM (1991). Ground reaction force analysis of horses ridden at the walk and trot. Equine Exercise Physiology 3: 120–127.Google Scholar
28Merkens, HW, Schamhardt, HC, Osch, GJVM and [van den] Bogert, AJ (1993). Ground reaction force patterns of Dutch Warmbloods at the canter. American Journal of Veterinary Research 54: 670–674.Google Scholar
29Payne, RC, Veenman, P and Wilson, AM (2004). The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion. Journal of Anatomy 205: 479–490.Google Scholar