Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T10:28:10.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exponential stability for small perturbations of steep integrable Hamiltonian systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2004

LAURENT NIEDERMAN
Affiliation:
Université Paris XI, Topologie et Dynamique, UMR 8628 du CNRS, Bât 425, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France and IMCCE, Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, UMR 8028 du CNRS, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France (e-mail: Laurent.Niederman@math.u-psud.fr)

Abstract

In the 1970s, Nekhorochev proved that for an analytic nearly integrable Hamiltonian system with a perturbation of size $\varepsilon$, the actions linked to the unperturbed Hamiltonian vary only by the order of $\varepsilon^b$ over a time of the order of $\exp (C\varepsilon^{-a})$ for some positive constants a, b and C, provided that the unperturbed Hamiltonian meets some generic transversality condition known as steepness. Among steep systems, convex or quasiconvex systems are easier to describe since the use of energy conservation allows the proof of exponential estimates of stability to be shortened. In this case, Lochak–Neishtadt and Poschel have independently obtained the stability exponents a = b = 1/2n for systems of n degrees of freedom—especially the time exponent (a) is expected to be optimal (see P. Lochak, J.-P. Marco and D. Sauzin. Preprint. Institut de Máthematique de Jussieu, 1999; J.-P. Marco and D. Sauzin. Preprint. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Science, 2001). Moreover, Lochak's study relies on simultaneous Diophantine approximation which gives a very transparent proof.

However, the proof in the steep case has rarely been studied since Nekhorochev's original work despite various physical examples where the model Hamiltonian is only steep. Here, we combine the original scheme with a simultaneous Diophantine approximation as in Lochak's proof. This yields significant simplifications with respect to Nekhorochev's reasoning: it also allows the exponents $a=b=(2n p_1\dotsb p_{n-1})^{-1}$ where $(p_1\dotsb p_{n-1})$ are the steepness indices of the considered Hamiltonian to be obtained. In the quasiconvex case, the steepness indices are all equal to one and we find the same exponents 1/2n as Lochak–Neishtadt and Poschel, whose results are thus generalized to the steep case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)