Article contents
Classical motion in random potentials
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2012
Abstract
We consider the motion of a classical particle under the influence of a random potential on ℝd, in particular the distribution of asymptotic velocities and the question of ergodicity of time evolution.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- ©2012 Cambridge University Press
References
[Aar97]Aaronson, J.. An Introduction to Infinite Ergodic Theory (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 50). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.Google Scholar
[AK98]Asch, J. and Knauf, A.. Motion in periodic potentials. Nonlinearity 11(1) (1998), 175–200.Google Scholar
[AM78]Abraham, R. and Marsden, J. E.. Foundations of Mechanics, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, 1978.Google Scholar
[Arn78]Arnol’d, V. I.. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, 1978.Google Scholar
[BBI01]Burago, D., Burago, Y. and Ivanov, S.. A Course in Metric Geometry (Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 33). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Bow75]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms. Springer, Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
[BS81]Bunimovich, L. A. and Sinai, Y. G.. Statistical properties of Lorentz gas with periodic configuration of scatterers. Comm. Math. Phys. 78 (1981), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CLS10]Cristadoro, G., Lenci, M. and Seri, M.. Recurrence for quenched random Lorentz tubes. Chaos 20 (2010), 023115.Google Scholar
[DL91]Donnay, V. and Liverani, C.. Potentials on the two-torus for which the Hamiltonian flow is ergodic. Comm. Math. Phys. 135 (1991), 267–302.Google Scholar
[EO73]Eberlein, P. and O’Neill, B.. Visibility manifolds. Pacific J. Math. 46 (1973), 45–109.Google Scholar
[GHL48]Gallot, S., Hulin, D. and Lafontaine, J.. Riemannian Geometry. Springer, Berlin, 1948.Google Scholar
[Hir76]Hirsch, M. W.. Differential Topology (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 33). Springer, Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar
[Hop39]Hopf, E.. Statistik der geodätischen Linien in Mannigfaltigkeiten negativer Krümmung. Ber. Verh. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig 91 (1939), 261–304.Google Scholar
[Hop41]Hopf, E.. Statistik der Lösungen geodätischer Probleme vom unstabilen Typus II. Math. Ann. 117 (1941), 590–608.Google Scholar
[Kel98]Keller, G.. Equilibrium States in Ergodic Theory (London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 42). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
[KK92]Klein, M. and Knauf, A.. Classical Planar Scattering by Coulombic Potentials (Lecture Notes in Physics, 13). Springer, Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
[KK08]Knauf, A. and Krapf, M.. The non-trapping degree of scattering. Nonlinearity 21 (2008), 2023–2041.Google Scholar
[Kli95]Klingenberg, W. P. A.. Riemannian Geometry, 2nd edn(de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 1). de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995.Google Scholar
[Kna87]Knauf, A.. Ergodic and topological properties of Coulombic periodic potentials. Comm. Math. Phys. 110 (1987), 89–112.Google Scholar
[Kna90]Knauf, A.. Closed orbits and converse KAM theory. Nonlinearity 3 (1990), 961–973.Google Scholar
[Kna11]Knauf, A.. Mathematische Physik: Klassische Mechanik (Master Class). Springer, Berlin, 2011.Google Scholar
[Len03]Lenci, M.. Aperiodic Lorentz gas: recurrence and ergodicity. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 869–883.Google Scholar
[LMW03]Leschke, H., Müller, P. and Warzel, S.. A survey of rigorous results on random Schrödinger operators for amorphous solids. Markov Process. Related Fields 9 (2003), 729–760.Google Scholar
[LW95]Liverani, C. and Wojtkowski, M. P.. Ergodicity in Hamiltonian systems. Dynamics Reported (Dynam. Report. Expositions Dynam. Systems (N.S.), 4). Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 130–202.Google Scholar
[Nat01]Natterer, F.. The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography (Classics in Applied Mathematics, 32). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2001.Google Scholar
[PF92]Pastur, L. A. and Figotin, A.. Spectra of Random and Almost-Periodic Operators (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 297). Springer, Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
[P{ö}s82]Pöschel, J.. Integrability of Hamiltonian systems on cantor sets. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (1982), 653–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[PP94]Paternain, G. P. and Paternain, M.. On Anosov energy levels of convex Hamiltonian systems. Math. Z. 217(1) (1994), 367–376.Google Scholar
[RF11]Roeck, W. D. and Fröhlich, J.. Diffusion of a massive quantum particle coupled to a quasi-free thermal medium. Comm. Math. Phys. 303 (2011), 613–707.Google Scholar
[Rue87]Ruelle, D.. A mathematical reformulation of Derrida’s REM and GREM. Comm. Math. Phys. 108 (1987), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sch04]Schumacher, C.. Klassische Bewegung in zufälligen Potenzialen. Diplomarbeit, University Erlangen–Nuremberg, 2004.Google Scholar
[Sch10]Schumacher, C.. Klassische Bewegung in zufälligen Potenzialen mit Coulomb–Singularitäten. PhD Thesis, University Erlangen–Nuremberg, 2010.Google Scholar
[SKM87]Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. and Mecke, J.. Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1987.Google Scholar
[Ves08]Veselić, I.. Existence and Regularity Properties of the Integrated Density of States of Random Schrödinger Operators (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1917). Springer, Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar
[Wal82]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 79). Springer, Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by