Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:37:29.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonstate Threats and the Principled Reform of the UN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Roundtable
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the High-Level Panel on Financing for Development, UNGA 55th Session, June 26, 2001, A/55/1000, p. 3.

2 G.K. Chesterton, Queen of the Seven Swords (London: Sheed and Ward, 1944), pp. 7–8.

3 The Bhagavad Gita, trans. P. Lal (New Delhi: Lotus Collection, Roli Books, 2004), p. 65.

4 See Ibrahim Gambari, “Rwanda: An African Perspective,” in David Malone, ed., The UN Security Council (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004), p. 512.

5 Justice Fitzmaurice, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) Adv. Op., ICJ Rep (1971).

6 Under the statute, the ICJ is not bound by Litispendence, as demonstrated in the U.S. Hostages in Iran and the Aegean Continental Shelf cases.