Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T15:42:56.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hele–Shaw flows with time-dependent free boundaries in which the fluid occupies a multiply-connected region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

S. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Abstract

We consider the classical Hele-Shaw situation with two parallel planes separated by a narrow gap. A blob of Newtonian fluid is sandwiched between the planes, and we suppose its plan-view to occupy a bounded, multiply-connected domain; physically, we have a viscous fluid with the holes giving rise to the multiple connectivity occupied by relatively inviscid air. The relevant free boundary condition is taken to be one of constant pressure, but we allow different pressures to act within the different holes, and at the outer boundary. The motion is driven either by injection of further fluid into the blob at certain points, or by injection of air into the holes to change their area, or by a combination of these; suction, instead of injection, is also contemplated. A general mathematical theory of the above class of problems is developed, and applied to the particular situation that arises when fluid is injected into an initially empty gap bounded by two straight, semi-infinite barriers meeting at right-angles: injection into a quarterplane. For a range of positions of the injection point, air is trapped in the corner and, invoking images, the problem is equivalent to one involving a doubly-connected blob. When there is an air vent in the corner, so that the pressure is the same on the two free boundaries in these circumstances, the air hole rapidly disappears, as might be expected. If, however, there is no air vent and we suppose the air to be incompressible, so that the area of the region occupied by the air in the plan-view remains constant, we find there to be no solution within the framework of our model. Other scenarios within this same geometry, involving both suction and injection of fluid at the injection point, and air at the corner, are also examined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowman, F. 1961 Introduction to Elliptic Functions with Applications. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Byrd, P. F. & Friedman, M. D. 1971 Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd edn.Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, A. A., Howison, S. D., Ockendon, J. R. & Wilmott, P. 1990 Irregular morphologies in unstable Hele-Shaw free-boundary problems. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 43, 387405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. M. 1970 Jacobian Elliptic Function Tables. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Nehari, Z. 1952 Conformal Mapping. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 1972 Hele Shaw flows with a free boundary produced by the injection of fluid into a narrow channel. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 609618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, S. 1981 Some Hele Shaw flows with time-dependent free boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 263278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, S. 1982 Hele Shaw flows with time-dependent free boundaries in infinite and semi-infinite strips. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 35, 531548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, S. 1992 Hele Shaw flows with time-dependent free boundaries involving injection through slits. Stud. Appl. Math. 87, 175194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1991 Selection mechanisms and stability of fingers and bubbles in Hele-Shaw cells. IMA J. Appl. Math. 46, 137145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, M. 1978 A moment problem on Jordan domains. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 70, 3538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottky, F. 1887 Ueber eine specielle Function, welche bei einer bestimmten linearen Transformation ihres Arguments unverändert bleibt. J. reine angew. Math. 101, 227272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar