Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T08:30:48.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democratising Food Safety: Why We Need to Look Beyond Government Regulation and Provide a Citizen Right of Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2024

Neal David Fortin*
Affiliation:
Institute for Food Laws and Regulations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

Abstract

Imperfect information on food safety and risk has created a system with less safety than the public wants. Consumers cannot pay for the level of safety they desire. Tort under-compensates for foodborne illness due to difficulty proving causation. When market controls are ineffective at producing the level of safety desired by consumers, the classic approach is government regulation. However, government regulators face challenges that impede the translation of scientific knowledge into regulatory controls. This often results in an equilibrium of private interests and bureaucratic interests rather than the public interest. To restore republican deliberation on food safety we need greater citizen involvement in the decision-making. Access to the courts is an effective means for citizens to participate directly in the decisions affecting food safety; thus, a private cause of action to our national food safety laws is proposed.

Type
Preface
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 John M. Antle, Choice and Efficiency in Food Safety Policy 44–45, 54–55 (AEI Press 1995).

2 Craig Harris, Andrew Knight, and Michelle R. Worosz, “Shopping for Food Safety and the Public Trust: What Supply Chain Stakeholders Need to Know About Consumer Attitudes” (Jun/Jul 2006) Food Safety Mag 52.

3 A 2008–09 foodborne Salmonella Typhimurium outbreak linked to peanut paste sold by Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) was magnified because PCA was an intermediate processor, and its peanut products were used as ingredients in more than 3,900 products. The CDC attributed 714 cases of illness and 9 deaths. Kelsey Wittenberger and Erik Dohlman, “Impacts of the 2008–09 Foodborne Illness Outbreak Linked to Salmonella in Peanuts” (February 2010) Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. See also, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Infections Associated with Peanut Butter and Peanut Butter-Containing Products – United States, 2008–2009” (Feb 6, 2009) 58(04) Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Rep 85.

4 In 2011, Jensen Farms cantaloupe caused a Listeria monocytogenes outbreak that infected at least 146 people in 28 states with 36 deaths and one miscarriage. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Linked to Whole Cantaloupes from Jensen Farms, Colorado” (Final Update) (27 August 2012) https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/cantaloupes-jensen-farms/index.html#print (last accessed 17 January 2024).

5 Troy Segal, “Profit Margins for the Food and Beverage Sector” (28 February 2023) Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/071015/what-profit-margin-usual-company-food-and-beverage-sector.asp and CSIMarket (last visited 16 December 2023); Food Processing Industry Profitability https://csimarket.com/Industry/industry_Profitability_Ratios.php?ind=505 (last accessed 16 December 2023).

6 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Burden of Foodborne Illness: Findings, https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html (last accessed 17 December 2023). (“CDC estimates that each year roughly 1 in 6 Americans (or 48 million people) gets sick, 128,000 are hospitalised, and 3,000 die of foodborne diseases.”); Elaine Scallan, and others, “Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens” (2011) 17(1) Emerging Infectious Diseases 7.

7 USDA Economic Research Service, “Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illness” https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illnesses.aspx (last accessed 17 December 2023).

8 Paul L. Hollis, “Peanut Scare Could Cost Growers $1 billion” (17 April 2009) Farm Progress, (“[W]e could see total losses of a billion dollars due to this recall,” Don Loehler, executive director of the Georgia Peanut Commission, said during testimony before members of Congress.”) https://www.farmprogress.com/peanut/peanut-scare-could-cost-growers-1-billion (last accessed 17 December 2023).

9 Tanya Roberts, “WTP Estimates of the Societal Costs of Food-borne Illness” (2007) 89:5 Amer J Agr Econ 1183, 1184.

10 Ian Ayres and John Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (1992) 63.

11 Richard B. Stewart and Cass R. Sunstein, “Public Programs and Private Rights” (1982) 95 Harv L Rev 1193, 1196.

12 Neal D. Fortin, “The Hang-Up With HACCP: The Resistance to Translating Science into Food Safety Law” (2003) 58:4 Food & Drug L J 53.

13 Ayres and Braithwaite, n 10, 80.

14 Carl W. Hall and G. Malcolm Trout, Milk Pasteurization (1968) 2–4.

15 Public Citizen v Heckler (1985) 602 F Supp 611, 612, 614; Public Citizen v Heckler (D.D.C. 1986) 653 F Supp 1229, 1241.

16 Glen Staszewski, “The Federal Inaction Commission” (2009) 59 Emory L J 369 (addressing the chronic problem of nonenforcement decisions).

17 The Clean Air Act was enacted in 1970, 42 USC §§ 7401–7671.

18 33 USC §§ 1251–1387.

19 42 USC §§ 6901–6992.

20 42 USC §§ 9601–9675.

21 15 USC 33 2601–2692.

22 30 USC §§ 1201–1328.

23 Michael Sant’Ambrogio, “Private Enforcement in Administrative Courts” (2019) 72 Vand L Rev 425.

24 Ibid.

25 21 USC § 337(a).

26 Bruce Dennis Sales, “Does the FDC Act Create a Private Right of Action” (1973) 28 Food Drug Cosm L J 501.

27 Ibid 503.

28 Baily v Johnson (1995) 48 F.3d 965 (6th Cir.) (citing Hearings on S.1944 Subcommittee of Committee on Commerce 73d Cong., 2d Sess.); Sales (n 26) 505–508.

29 21 USC § 337(b).

30 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Thompson (1986) 478 US 804, 810.

31 See, e.g., Pacific Trading Co. v Wilson and Co. (1976) 547 F.2d 367, 370–71 (7th Cir.); Griffin v O’Neal, Jones and Feldman, Inc. (1985) 604 F.Supp. 717 (S.D. Ohio); Keil v Eli Lilly & Co. (1980) 490 F.Supp. 479, 480 (E.D.Mich.); National Women’s Health Network, Inc. v A. H. Robins Co. (1982) 545 F.Supp. 1177 (D. Mass.); American Home Products Corp. v Johnson and Johnson (1977) 436 F.Supp. 785, 791 (S.D.N.Y.); Clairol, Inc. v Suburban Cosmetics and Beauty Supply, Inc. (1968) 278 F.Supp. 859, 860–61 (N.D. Ill.).

32 Article III, § 2, of the US Constitution provides that the federal judicial power shall extend to “all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.”

33 Touche Ross & Co. v Redington (1979) 442 US 560.

34 Robert D. Snook, “Environmental Citizen Suits and Judicial Interpretation: First Time Tragedy, Second Time Farce” (1998) 20 W New Eng L Rev 311.

35 33 USC § 1365.

36 Ibid.

37 Adam Babich, “Citizen Suits: The Teeth in Public Participation” (1995) 25 Envtl L Rep News & Analysis 10141.

38 James Springer, “The Success of the Citizen Suit: Protecting Consumers from Inaccurate Food Labeling by Amending the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act” (2013) 68 Food & Drug L J 401.

39 Ibid.

40 Ibid.

41 Sant’Ambrogio, n 23.

42 Glen Staszewski, “Reason-Giving and Accountability” (2009) 93 Minn L Rev 1253, 1281

43 Ibid. 621 (citing David Freeman Engstrom, Agencies as Litigation Gatekeepers (2013) 123 Yale LJ 616 (“Given that private enforcement is designed at least in part to counter possible agency capture, bringing agencies back into the picture risks returning the fox to the henhouse.”).

44 Sant’Ambrogio, n 23, 424.

45 Michael E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (2011).