Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T13:22:55.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democracy and Industrialisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Get access

Extract

Looking at the contemporary world, two things are obvious: democracy is doing rather badly, and democracy is doing very well. ‘New states are born free, yet everywhere they are in chains.’ Democracy is doing very badly in that democratic institutions have fallen by the wayside in very many of the newly independent ‘transitional’ societies, and they are precarious elsewhere. Democracy, on the other hand, is doing extremely well in as far as it is almost (though not quite) universally accepted as a valid norm. It is almost as if its success as a norm of legitimacy were inversely related to its success in concrete implementation.

Type
Paradoxes of transitional societies
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Aron, R., Essai sur les libertés (Paris 1965).Google Scholar

* The first draft of this paper was prepared for a conference on «The Idea of Democracy in Transitional Societies», held at the Villa Falconieri at Frascati in April 1966, under the auspices of the Social Science Research Council (of the United States of America). I should like to express my gratitude both to the Council and to all the participants. I am particularly indebted to conversations with Professors R. P. Wolff, R.P. Dore, P. H. Partridge, John Plamenatz, Giovanni Sartori, and the Honorable Charles Frankel. Needless to say, the responsibility for the views expressed is mine alone.