Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T21:39:24.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethical Substance of Salvation

Materiality and Religious Rejection of the World in a London Mosque

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2020

Elisabeth Becker
Elisabeth Becker*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Religious Studies and the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture [ejb3sx@virginia.edu]
Get access

Abstract

Materiality has been largely left out of the study of Muslim life in Europe, and limited to an etic rather than emic approach. In this paper, I analyse a conservative London mosque community (the East London Mosque) that depends on the material––what I term “ethical substance”––to reinforce its ascetic rejection of the world. Drawing from five months of ethnographic research in this mosque, I examine three aspects of materiality––clothing, the mosque building, and technology––in order to explore how the community negotiates its position in the city at hand, as well as more broadly vis-à-vis modernity. The mosque emerges as a site of discursive-material tension where ethics and locale intersect, and where intention (niyya) matters more than the constitution of objects. It elucidates European modernity as broader than liberal democratic ideals (i.e. in a community stressing a returns towards, rather than away from, tradition).

Résumé

Résumé

La matérialité a été largement laissée de côté dans l’étude de la vie musulmane en Europe, et limitée à une approche étique plutôt qu’émique. Dans cet article, j’analyse la communauté d’une mosquée conservatrice de Londres (la East London Mosque) qui dépend de la matière – ce que j’appelle la « substance éthique » – pour renforcer son rejet ascétique du monde. En m’appuyant sur cinq mois de recherche ethnographique dans cette mosquée, j’examine trois aspects de la matérialité : les vêtements, le bâtiment de la mosquée et la technologie, afin d’explorer comment la communauté négocie sa position dans la ville en question et plus largement dans la modernité. La mosquée apparaît comme un site de tension discursive-matérielle où l’éthique et le milieu se croisent, et où l’intention (niyya) importe plus que la constitution des objets. La modernité européenne y est présentée comme plus vaste que les idéaux démocratiques libéraux, à l’intérieur d’une communauté qui met l’accent sur un retour vers la tradition.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Das Wesentlichkeitsprinzip wurde bei der Untersuchung des muslimischen Lebens in Europa weitgehend ignoriert und mehr auf einen etischen als auf einen emischen Ansatz beschränkt. In diesem Aufsatz untersuche ich eine konservative muslimische Gemeinde in London (die East London Mosque), die sich auf Wesentlichkeit – ich nenne sie „ethische Substanz“ – stützt, um ihre asketische Ablehnung der Welt zu verstärken. Grundlage meiner Beobachtungen ist ein fünfmonatiges ethnografisches Forschungsprojekt in dieser Moschee. Drei Aspekte der Wesentlichkeit oder Materialität werden erörtert: Die Kleidung, das Gebäude der Moschee und die Technologie, um zu beschreiben, wie die muslimische Gemeinschaft ihren städtischen Standort sowie im weiteren Sinne ihre Verortung in der Moderne aushandelt. Die Moschee erscheint als ein Ort der diskursiv-materiellen Spannung, an dem sich Ethik und Umgebung überschneiden und an dem die Absicht (niyya) wichtiger ist als die Konstitution von Objekten. Die europäische Moderne geht hier weit über die liberal-demokratischen Ideale hinaus, und dies innerhalb einer Gemeinschaft, die eine Rückkehr zur Tradition betont.

Keywords

IslamEuropeMosqueMaterialityModernity.IslamEuropeMosquéeMatérialitéModernité.IslamEuropaMoscheeMaterialitätModerne.
Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , April 2020 , pp. 129 - 158
Copyright
© European Journal of Sociology 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajrouch, Kristine and Jamal, Amaney, 2007. “Assimilating to a White identity: The case of Arab Americans,” International Migration Review, 41: 860-879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf, 1994. The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam (Al-Halal Wal HaramFii Islam) (Plainfield, IN, American Trust).Google Scholar
Arkoun, Mohammed, 2006. “Present-Day Islam Between its Tradition and Globalization,” in Kamrava Mehran (ed.), The New Voices of Islam: Rethinking Politics and Modernity (Berkeley, University of California Press: 29-64).Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford, Stanford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, Leora, 2000. “Bavarian Crucifixes and French Headscarves: Religious Practices and the Postmodern European State,” Cultural Dynamics, 12 (3): 183-209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartakowski, John and Read, Jen’an, 2003. “Veiled Submission: Gender, Power, and Identity Among Evangelical and Muslim Women in the United States,” Qualitative Sociology, 26 (1): 71-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Elisabeth, 2017. “Good Mosque, Bad Mosque: Boundaries to Belonging in Contemporary Germany,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 85 (4): 1050-1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodnar, Judit and Molnar, Virag, 2009. “Reconfiguring Private and Public: State, Capital and New Housing Developments in Berlin and Budapest,” Urban Studies, 47 (4): 789-812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1990 The Logic of Practice (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Bowen, John, 2007. Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space (Princeton, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, John, 2016. On British Islam: Religion, Law and Everyday Practice in Shari’a (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bracke, Sarah and Fadil, Nadia, 2012. “‘Is the headscarf oppressive or emancipatory?’ Field notes from the multicultural debate,” Religion and Gender, 2 (1): 36-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelli, Elizabeth, 2012. “‘When you see blood, it brings truth’: Ritual and resistance in a time of war,” in Dirck Houtman and Birgit Meyer (eds), Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality (New York, Fordham University Press: 232-249).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, John, 2012. “The Effect of Religiosity on Secular and Ascetic Deviance,” Sociological Focus, 21 (4) 293-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Michael, 2000. Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cheng, Jennifer, 2015. “Islamophobia, Muslimophobia, or Racism: Parliamentary Discourses on Islam and Muslims in Debates on the Minaret in Switzerland,” Discourse and Society, 26 (5): 1-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHanas, Daniel Nilsson, 2016. London Youth, Religion, and Politics: Engagement and Activism from Brixton to Brick Lane (Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Entreves, Maurizio, 2019. “Hannah Arendt”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/arendt/].Google Scholar
DuBose, Todd, 2014. “Lived Theology,” in David Leemind (ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion (Boston, Springer).Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile, [1912] 1995. Elementary Forms of Religious Life, (New York, The Free Press).Google Scholar
East London Mosque, 2016. “History,” retrieved 12 September 2016 [http://www.eastlondonmosque.org.uk/content/history].Google Scholar
El Fadl, Khaled, 2001. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women (London, One World).Google Scholar
El Fadl, Khaled, 2006. The Search for Beauty in Islam: A Conference of the Books (Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Fadil, Nadia and Fernando, Mayanthi, 2015. “Rediscovering the ‘everyday’ Muslim: Notes on an anthropological divide,” Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5 (2): 59-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faizer, Rizwi, 1996. “Muhammad and the Medinan Jews: A Comparison of the Texts of Ibn Ishaq’s Kitāb sīrat rasūl Allāh with al-Waqidi's Kitāb al-maghāzī’ ,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 28 (4): 463-489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, Didier, 2014. “The Ethical Turn in Anthropology: Promises and Uncertainty,” Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 429-435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard, 2005. “Representing the city: mosques and the planning process in Birmingham,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31 (6): 1161-1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Gole, Nilufer, 2011. “The public visibility of Islam and the politics of resentment: the minarets-mosques debates,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 37 (4): 383-392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Martin and Hasan, Mubashar, 2015. “Playing with fire: Islamism and politics in Bangladesh,” Asian Journal of Political Science, 23 (2): 226-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulay, Erol, 2007. “The Gülen Phenomenon: A Neo-Sufi Challenge to Turkey’s Rival Elite,” Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 16 (1): 37-61.Google Scholar
Hoover, Jon, 2009. “A common word: “More positive and open, yet mainstream and orthodox,” Theological Review, 30 (1): 55-77.Google Scholar
Houtman, Dick and Aupers, Stef, 2010. “Religions of Modernity Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital,” in Dick Houtman and Stef Aupers, Religions of Modernity: Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital (Leiden/Boston, Brill: 1-30).Google Scholar
Howard, Ian, 1981. “The development of the ‘adhan’ and ‘iqama’ of the salat in early Islam,” Journal of Semitic Studie’s, 26: 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Benton, 1964. “Ascetic Protestantism and Political Preference in the Deep South,” American Journal of Sociology, 69 (4): 359-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonker, Geridien, 2005. “The Mevlana-Mosque in Berlin-Kreuzberg: An Unsolved Conflict in Europe,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies : 1067-1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouili, Jeanette, 2015. Pious Practice and Secular Constraints (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Jung, Cindy, 2016. Criminalization of the Burkini, Harvard International Review, 38 (1).Google Scholar
Kaell, Hillary, 2014. Walking Where Jesus Walked: American Christians and Holy Land Pilgrimage (New York, New York University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamali, Mohammad, 2015. The Middle Path of Moderation in Islam: The Qur'anic Principle of Wasatiyyah (Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, Webb, 2003. “Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things,” Language and Communication, 23 (2-3): 409-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, Webb, 2005. “The Hazards of New Clothes: What Signs Make Possible,” in Susan Kuchler and Graeme Were (eds), The Art of Clothing: A Pacific Experience (New York, Routledge: 1-16).Google Scholar
Keane, Webb, 2006. “Subjects and Objects,” in Christopher Tilley, Keane Webb, Susan Kuechler Mike Rowlands and Patricia Spyer (eds.), Handbook of Material Culture (London, Sage Publications: 197-202).Google Scholar
Keane, Webb, 2007. Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, 2005. Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba, 2008. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and Feminist Subject (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Meer, Nasar and Modood, Tariq, 2009. “Refutations of racism in the ‘Muslim question,’” Patterns of Prejudice, 43 (3-4): 335-354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Daniel, 2005. “Materiality: An Introduction,” in Daniel Miller (ed.), Materiality (Durham, Duke University Press: 1-50).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modood, Tariq, 2013. Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea (Cambridge, Polity).Google Scholar
Moosa, Ebrahim, 2015. What is a Madrasa? Islamic Civilization and Muslim Networks (Chapel, University of North Carolina Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moruzzi, Norma, 1994. “A Problem with Headscarves: Contemporary Complexities of Political and Social Identity,” Political Theory, 22 (4): 653-672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed, 1996. Mawdudi and the Making of Islamic Revivalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ozdalga, Esra, 2000 “World asceticism in Islamic casting: Fethullah Gülen’s inspired piety and activism,” Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 9 (17): 83-104.Google Scholar
Ozyurek, Esra, 2005. “The Politics of Cultural Unification, Secularism, and the Place of Islam in the New Europe,” American Ethnologist, 32 (4): 509-512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozyurek, Esra, 2015. Being German, Becoming Muslim: Race, Religion, and Conversion in the New Europe (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Parvez, Fareen, 2011. “Debating the Burqa in France: the Antipolitics of Islamic Revival,” Qualitative Sociology, 34 (2): 287-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, Lori, 2005. “Becoming Muslim: The Development of a Religious Identity,” Sociology of Religion, 66 (3): 215-242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reetz, Dietrich, 2007. “The Deoband Universe: What Makes a Transcultural and Transnational Educational Movement of Islam,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 27 (1): 139-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J., 2004. (Mis) representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers (Amsterdam, John Benjamin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, 1965. De l’interpretation: Essai sur Freud [Freud and Philosophy] (Paris, Editions du Seuil).Google Scholar
Saint-Blancat, Chantal and Di Friedberg O., Otavia Schmidt, 2005 “Why are Mosques a Problem? Local Politics and Fear of Islam in Northern Italy,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31 (6): 1083-1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvatore, Armando, 2016. The Sociology of Islam: Knowledge, Power and Civility (Oxford, Wiley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadid, W. and Van Koningsveld, Pieter, 2005. “Muslim Dress in Europe: Debates on the Headscarf,” Journal of Islamic Studies, 16 (1): 35-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 2007. A Secular Age (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Bryan, 2007. “Religious authority and the new media,” Theory, Culture and Society, 24 (2): 117-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Bryan, [1996] 2008. The Body & Society: Explorations in Social Theory (Los Angeles, Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan, 2016. “Introduction: Mapping the Sociology of Religion,” in B. Turner (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion (Walden, Blackwell: 1-30).Google Scholar
Vakulenko, Anastasia, 2007. “Islamic Dress in Hyman Rights Jurisprudence: A Critique of Current Trends,” Human Rights Law Review, 7 (4): 717-739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max, 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, [1934] 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: and Other Writings (London, Penguin Classics).Google Scholar
Werbner, Pnina, 2005. “Islamophobia: Incitement to religious hatred—legislating for a new fear,” Anthropology Today, 21 (1): 5-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, Ellen, 2007. “Headscarves, Human Rights and Harmonious Multicultural Societies: Implications of the French Ban for Interpretations of Equality,” Law and Society Review, 41 (3): 699-736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchester, Daniel, 2017. “A Part of Who I Am: Material Objects as “Plot Devices” in the Formation of Religious Selves,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56 (1): 83-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusuf, Hamza, 2004. Purification of the Heart: Signs, Symptoms and Cures of the Spiritual Diseases of the Heart (New York, Starlatch Press).Google Scholar
Zandbergen, , 2010. “Silicon Valley New Age: The Co-Constitution of the Digital and the Sacred,” in Dick Houtman and Stef Aupers, Religions of Modernity: Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital (Leiden/Boston, Brill: 161-186).Google Scholar