Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:27:44.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTERPRETATION UPDATED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2005

MICHAEL ROOT
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota [Mdroot@umn.edu]
Get access

Extract

IN 1982, SEVEN PEOPLE in the Chicago area died after taking Tylenol capsules laced with cyanide. Newspapers at the time wondered about the motives of the killer. A few looked for an economic motive for the crime and speculated that the killer was an investor in Johnson and Johnson, the manufacturer of the drug, who had sold his stock in the company short. According to this economic interpretation of the event, the deaths, the killer reasoned, would cause a sharp decline in the price of the stock, and, under these conditions, a short seller would turn a tidy profit by covering his sale with shares bought after the murders; while there was no direct evidence of any significant amount of short selling around the time of the crime, had a capital gain been the killer's motive, his actions would have been rational and, as result, easier for us to understand than if we were to suppose that he poisoned the capsules for no reason. In fact, one story carried the headline “Tylenol Murders Rational After All”.

Type
NOTES CRITIQUES
Copyright
© 2004 Archives Européennes de Sociology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mark W. Risjord, Woodcutters and Witchcraft: Rationality and Interpretative Change in the Social Sciences (Albany, N.Y., State University of New York Press, 2000, 201 p.).