Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:04:08.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sociology and history: M. S. Archer's Social Origins of Educational Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Get access

Extract

One of the more ambitious intellectual projects of recent years is the body of work by Margaret S. Archer which centres on her Social Origins of Educational Systems, published in 1979. Archer's thesis is that modern educational systems are of two basic kinds, centralized and decentralized, and that their character and functioning are conditioned by the social and political conflicts of their formative phases. The underlying contrast is between France and England: this was Archer's starting-point, and in 1971 she published Social Conflict and Educational Change in England and France 1789–1848 in collaboration with Michalina Vaughan. Social Origins of Educational Systems extended this in time, bringing the story down to the present day, and in national coverage, adding Russia and Denmark to the countries examined. A shorter ‘University edition’—reduced to 234 pages from over 800—has now been published which is again restricted to England and France.

Type
Notes Critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, L., Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays (London, NLB, 1971).Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Education in France 1848–1870 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Education and Opportunity in Victorian Scotland. Schools and Universities (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1983 a).Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Education and the state in nineteenth-century Scotland, Economic History Review, 2nd series, XXXVI (1983 b), 518–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Secondary schools and Scottish society in the nineteenth century, Past and Present, CIX (1985), 176203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, M. S., all op. cit. in note.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. and Vaughan, M., op. cit.Google Scholar
Cherkaoui, M., Socialisation et conflit: les systèmes éducatifs et leur histoire selon Durkheim, Revue française de sociologie, XVII (1976), 197212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherkaoui, M., Système social et savoir scolaire. Les enjeux politiques de la distribution des connaissances selon Durkheim, Revue française de science politique, XXVIII (1978), 313–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. E., On the development of educational systems, American Journal of Education, LXXXIX (19801981), 189211.Google Scholar
Hopper, E. (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Educational Systems (London, Hutchinson, 1971).Google Scholar
Howe, A.The Cotton Masters 1830–1860 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Jarausch, K. H. (ed.), The Transformation of Higher Learning 1860–1930. Expansion, diversification, social opening, and professionalization in England, Germany, Russia, and the United States (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Joyce, P., Work, Society and Politics. The culture of the factory in later Victorian England (Brighton, Harvester, 1980).Google Scholar
Kazamias, A. M. and Schwartz, K., Sociological theories and educational change, Comparative Education Review, XVII (1973), 245–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, T. W., English and French education in the nineteenth century, History of Education Quarterly, XIII (1973), 5360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prost, A., Histoire de l'enseignement en France 1800–1967 (Paris, Armand Colin, 1968).Google Scholar
Ringer, F. K., Education and Society in Modern Europe (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Scotford-Morton, M. [later Archer], op. cit. note.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Conflict and Compromise. Class formation in English society 1830–1914. A comparative study of Birmingham and Sheffield (London, Routledge, 1982).Google Scholar
Vaughan, M., and Archer, M. S., op. cit. note.Google Scholar