Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T03:23:44.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1181 – Short-term Management Of Agitation Associated With Psychotic Or Bipolar Disorders: a Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Y. Dundar
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, UK Mersey Care NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
J. Greenhalgh
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Agitation is a broad term used to describe a cluster of symptoms that may range from mild to severe. It is a common feature of psychotic and bipolar disorders, and can be distressing both emotionally and physically. Patients with agitation are unable to relax and show signs of restlessness such as pacing, pressured speech or shouting. Severely agitated patients are at risk of causing harm to themselves and others. Although milder forms of agitation may be managed with psychological interventions, more severe agitation may need pharmacological treatment.

Objectives

  1. 1) to systematically review the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological interventions used to management agitation associated with psychotic or bipolar disorders,

  2. 2) to identify gaps in the research evidence base to inform decisions on research priorities.

Methods

Electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo and The Cochrane Library were searched for relevant published literature of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Predefined inclusion criteria were applied to citations in a two-stage process. Outcome measures included change in agitation levels as measured by accepted standard scales (e.g. PANSS-EC) clinical improvement as measured by The Clinical Global Impression rating scales and treatment emergent adverse effects.

Results

In total, 17 RCTs with a total trial population of 4104 were included in the review. Of these, 11 compared one or more antipsychotics and 6 compared an antipsychotic with a benzodiazepine. Final results of the data synthesis will be reported.

Conclusions

The results of the review will summarise the current evidence base and identify future research needs.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.