Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:05:48.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

687 – Bifactor Models Support ICD-10 Construct of ADHD Against DSM-IV, Both in Children Rated by Teachers and Self-rated in Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

H.M. Caci ,
A.J.S. Morin ,
J. Bouchez  and
F.J. Baylé
H.M. Caci
Affiliation:
Pediatric Department, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU Lenval, Nice, France
A.J.S. Morin
Affiliation:
Centre for Positive Psychology and Education, University of Western Australia, Sydney, WA, Australia
J. Bouchez
Affiliation:
UMD, Hopital Paul Guiraud, Villejuif Service de Psychiatrie (Prof. Roland Jouvent), Hopital Pitié-Salpetrière, APHP
F.J. Baylé
Affiliation:
Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, Groupe Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is present in both DSM-IV and ICD-10, with slight differences. For instance, one item is allocated to hyperactivity in DSM-IV and to impulsivity in ICD-10. ADHD is best conceived as a set of core symptoms with some specificity in phenotypal symptomatology. Regarding the specific components, their number remains an open question, the answer oscillating between two (Attention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity) and three (Attention, Hyperactivity, and Impulsivity).

Aims:

The aim of this study is to contrast alternative measurement models of instruments assessing ADHD symptoms (2 versus 3 specific factors, hierarchical versus bifactor models) across instruments, and age groups.

Methods:

We analysed data from the new ChiP-ARD study. Youths (n = 892) aged 5 to 18 years-old were randomly selected and rated by their teachers (ADHD-Rating Scale, and SWAN). Parents (n = 1,171) of these youths rated their own behaviour using the Adult ADHD Symptom Rating Scale (ASRS). The fit of alternative models for ordered-categorical items was tested using the robust Weighted Least Square Estimator (WLSMV).

Results:

Results support a bifactor model including one global ADHD factor and two specific Inattention and Hyperactivity- Impulsivity factors. The results also show that the Hyperactivity-Impulsivity factor is improperly defined, and unreliable, calling into question the existence of this subtype. Furthermore, the fit improved when Impulsivity was measured by 4 (ICD-10) versus 3 (DSM-IV) items.

Conclusion:

ADHD is a continuous condition from childhood to adulthood, and the “Talk too much” item is best conceived as a measure of Impulsivity than Hyperactivity.

Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 28 , Issue S1: Abstracts of the 21th European Congress of Psychiatry , 2013 , 28-E205
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.