Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T19:07:55.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1644 – Differential Diagnosis of Schizophrenia vs. Borderline Personality Disorder Using Pattern Classification Methods in Structural Mri Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. Von Saldern
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
E. Meisenzahl-Lechner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
L. Kambeitz-Ilankovic
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
C. Cabral
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
N. Koutsouleris
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Everyday clinical routine is frequently challenged by difficulty to choose among differential diagnostic options, since many psychiatric disorders share similar phenotypes. E.g., borderline personality disorder (BPD) and schizophrenia (SZ) can both be associated with psychotic syndromes.

Objectives

Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of combining sMRI data and pattern classification methods to differentiate between BPD and SZ.

Aims

We aim to introduce objective diagnostic measures to improve the reliability of clinical evaluations.

Methods

sMRI data of 114 female patients were used to train a multivariate disease classifier.

MR images were processed using voxel-based morphometry and high-dimensional registration to the MNI template. Grey matter volume maps were fed into a machine learning pipeline consisting of adjustment for possible age effects, PCA for dimensionality reduction and linear ν-support vector classification. Diagnostic performance of the classifier was determined by repeated nested 10-fold cross-validation.

Results

We were able to correctly classify unseen test subjects’ diagnosis with 74% accuracy. Classification sensitivity and specificity was 74%. Volume reductions in SZ vs. BPD were predominantly located in the left peri- and intrasylvian regions, orbitofrontal regions, the nucleus caudatus and the right cerebellum. Volume reductions in BPD compared to SZ were found predominantly in the left cerebellum, in limbic areas and the left inferior occipital gyrus.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that SZ can be differentiated from BPD at the single-subject level using sMRI and pattern classification methods. In future, this method might enhance clinical evaluations and improve accuracy and reliability of differential diagnosis.

Type
E08 - e-Poster Oral Session 08: Schizophrenia, Affective disorders, Addiction
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.