Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:26:02.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical implications of neurobiological research findings in offender patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

G.M. Adshead
G.M. Adshead*
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychotherapy, Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berks., United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Over the last century, there has been considerable interest in whether developments in neuropsychiatry can explain and help prevent antisocical behaviour. These historical discussions will be reviewed to put the current debates in context.

Method

I will present arguments for and against the use of neuropsychiatric data by the state for the purposes (a) of excusing antisocial behaviour and (b) predicting antisocial behaviour.

Conclusions

I will suggest that neuropsychiatric research can contribute to the development of proper questions about responsibility and public safety, but cannot provide the answers.

Type
S09. Symposium: Neurobiological Factors in Antisocial Disorders: Research, Clinical and Ethical Implications (Organised by the AEP Section on Forensic Psychiatry)
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 22 , Issue S1: 15th AEP Congress - Abstract book - 15th AEP Congress , March 2007 , pp. S15
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.