Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:29:35.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethical issues in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

F.J. Stone*
Affiliation:
Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence, London Visiting Professor of Professional Ethics, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent decades have witnessed a significant increase in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This includes an increased interest in, and use of, CAM in mental health, both as a primary source of treatment, and to treat side-effects of conventional medication. In the UK and elsewhere, much of CAM practice is unregulated, and the evidence base is under-developed. Many patients utilising CAMs do not disclose this to their doctors, raising risks of drug and other treatment interactions. Ethical issues associated with the use of CAM for mental health include: patient choice and consent for therapies of unknown efficacy, potential risks and benefits of CAM (including who evaluates these), and equity in terms of accessing treatments which are not generally provided as part of state-funded health services. Doctors have an ethical obligation to familiarise themselves with the range of CAM therapies their patients may be accessing and the evidence base for such treatments, both to facilitate informed decision-making on the part of their patients, and to help to minimise any potential for harm.

Type
PR02. Presidential Symposium on Ethics in Psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.