Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T02:17:50.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hysteria in neurology: a diagnostic approach to conversive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

A. Sanz Giancola*
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Psychiatry, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
I. Cuevas Iñiguez
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Psychiatry, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
C. Alvarez Garcia
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Psychiatry, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
M.D.C. Molina Liétor
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Psychiatry, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
M. Blanco Prieto
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Psychiatry, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Conversion disorder (a term that describes what was previously called hysteria) refers to motor or sensory symptoms, or both, that resemble a neurological disease, but that do not originate from or cannot be explained by a known physical disease.

Objectives

To find reliable tools that can guide the difficult diagnosis of conversion disorder.

Methods

Bibliographic review

Results

The exact prevalence of the disorder is unknown. It is estimated that approximately 5% of referrals to neurology are for this disorder. Approximately one third of patients referred to the neurologist have symptoms that cannot be explained by an organic disease. Involuntary movements are the most common motor manifestations of the conversive syndrome, being tremor one of the most frequent manifestations. The first differential diagnosis of conversion disorder is neurological disease. It is currently not necessary for the diagnosis to assess whether or not the symptoms are produced intentionally, as the assessment of conscious intentionality is unreliable. The neurological examination is the fundamental tool for the diagnostic approach, being even more enlightening than the complementary tests. Hoover’s sign, Babinski’s combined leg flexion, plantar flexion of the ankle, tremor and its distraction and synchronisation manoeuvres, as well as the clinical differences between epileptic seizures and non-epileptic seizures of psychogenic origin, are some of the reliable tools for a correct diagnosis.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of the disease should be one of exclusion. There must be clinical data showing clear evidence of incompatibility with a neurological disease and conversion symptoms do not correspond to known physiological mechanisms and anatomical pathways.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.