Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T02:27:17.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late 1800s Fringe Electrotherapeutic Devices: Comparative Electrical Capabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

D. Cox*
Affiliation:
New York Institute of Technology, College Of Osteopathic Medicine, Jonesboro, United States of America
B. Carr
Affiliation:
University of Florida College of Medicine, Department Of Psychiatry, Gainesville, United States of America
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Desperation for cure led to 19th century invention-- electrotherapeutic devices; replete with hyperbolic claims of cure-all, perceived ineffectiveness, and potential harm rendered the modality as quackery but were used in early brain stimulation, melancholia treatment, and cortex mapping. Here, antique devices are restored, and their electrophysiological qualities ascertained.

Objectives

Determine the comparative capabilities of these devices in delivering electrostimulation and compare with modern standards to understand possible electrophysiological sequelae.

Methods

Devices known as “medical batteries” were analyzed. Power delivery utilized a “voltaic battery”, simple circuit, and a conductor wrapped around an iron core. When the circuit is energized, the core is magnetized by direct current of the battery which induces an alternating current that electrifies probes used on the body. Due to their marked age, a common 9-volt battery was exchanged for the corrosive dry cell paste batteries. Electrical parameters were then measured.

Results

Table 1

DeviceFrequency (Hz)Resistance (Ohms)Max Output (Amps)Min Output (Amps)Max Output (Volts)Min Output (Volts)
Voltampa2k – 12K600.660.3360V20V
J.H. Bunnell & Co.’s No. 4 D.D.7k-10k5060.4300V20V
Schall & Son (London)b300-12004010.52.75420V110V

Conclusions

Devices for electrotherapeutics ranged from anemic vibrations to dangerous tetany inducing shocks. Measuring the capabilities of these devices shows the robust yields possible if the original higher capacity batteries were utilized. The reality is, cure or not, the devices were surprisingly potent. It is interesting that, albeit unrefined, efficacious doses were available before modern electrification.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.