Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:47:43.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Multidimensional Evaluation of Intimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

M. Sears*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology, Austin, United States of America
L. Mcmahon
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology, Austin, United States of America
C. Crosby
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology, Austin, United States of America
B. Freihart
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology, Austin, United States of America
C. Meston
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin, Psychology, Austin, United States of America
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Supportive, nurturing relationships facilitate good health, well-being, and life satisfaction. Intimacy is crucial for developing successful relationships as it strengthens bonds between partners through the exchange of personal details, love, and affection. Despite the importance of intimacy in developing strong relationships, the extant research often conflates affection, trust, and sexual acts with intimacy or only considers one aspect of an intimate relationship (i.e., physical or sexual touch) .

Objectives

The current study aimed to clarify what elicits feelings of intimacy in men and women in order to develop a more nuanced conceptualization of intimacy for use in future research and clinical practice.

Methods

In Study 1, women and men nominated over 2,700 items that “elicited feelings of intimacy” for them. Examples of nominations included: trust, communication, touch, attraction, and sex. Trained raters condensed duplicate items and created a final list of unique nominations for use in Study 2. Study 2 identified the factor structure of the nominated items by having a new sample of participants rate the extent each item elicited intimacy for them.

Results

Data collection is ongoing but will be completed by December 2021. Results will be updated with an addendum after data analysis.

Conclusions

will focus on gender differences in the factor structure of intimacy, how future research can avoid conflating this important construct with other relational aspects, and how a deeper understanding of intimacy can benefit treatment in clinical contexts and strengthen relationships more broadly.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.