Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T14:32:07.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Need for support and participation in treatment differences among subgroups of relatives to compulsorily and voluntarily admitted mentally ill individuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Margareta Östman
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, University Hospital, University of Lund, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
Lars Hansson
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, University Hospital, University of Lund, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
Get access

Summary

The need for support and participation in treatment of relatives to voluntarily and compulsorily admitted patients was addressed in a study of the quality of mental health services in two Swedish county councils. The aims of the study were to investigate differences in the above aspects between subgroups of relatives, the differences between two years of investigation, 1986 and 1991, and the differences between relatives of voluntarily and compulsorily admitted patients. The relatives investigated consisted of 79 spouses, 118 parents and 31 grown-up children. The results showed that there were only minor differences between the subgroups concerning their participation in care. Grown-up children experienced significantly less need of support and received less help for this need. In 1991, relatives participated more in the care situation, were more interested in support with regard to their own life situation, and also showed more positive attitudes towards the psychiatric services than in 1986. The relatives of the voluntarily admitted patients felt more involved in the patient's treatment, whereas the relatives of those compulsorily admitted felt less involved and perceived obstacles to admission.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brugha, TSWing, JKBrewin, CRMacCarthy, BMangen, SLesage, A, et al. The problems of people in long-term psychiatric care. An introduction to the Camberwell High Contact Survey Psychol Med 1988 ; 18 : 443-56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwall, PLScott, J. Burden of care, psychological distress and satisfaction with services in the relatives of acute mentally disordered adults Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1996 ; 31 : 345-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DSM III, American Psychiatric Organisation Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 3rd ed. Washington DC: APA; 1980.Google Scholar
Fadden, GBebbington, PKuipers, L. Br J Psychiatry 1987 ; 150 : 285-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falloon, IRHPederson, J. Family mangement in the prevention of morbidity of schizophrenia: The adjustment of the family unit Br J Psychiatry 1985 ; 147 : 156-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francell, CGConn, VSGray, DP. Families’ perception of burden of care for chronic mentally ill relatives Hosp Community Psychiatry 1988 ; 39 : 1296-300.Google Scholar
GAF Global assessment of functioning scale Mini-D-R, Diagnostiska kriterier enl DSM-III Stockholm: Pilgrim Press; 1989. p. 34-5.Google Scholar
Hatfield, AB. The Family as Partner in the Treatment of Mental Illness Hosp Community Psychiatry 1979 ; 30 : 338-40.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuipers, L. Family burden in schizophrenia: implications for services Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1993 ; 28 : 207-10.Google Scholar
Lamb, HROliphant, E. Schizophrenia Through the Eyes of Families Hosp Community Psychiatry 1979 ; 29 : 803-6.Google Scholar
Maccarthy, BLesage, ABrewin, CRBrugha, TSMangen, SWing, JK. Needs for care among the relatives of long-term users of day-care Psychol Med 1989 ; 19 : 725-36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macmillan, JFGold, ACrow, TJ. The Northwick Park Study of first episodes of schizophrenia. IV. Expressed emotion and relapse Br J Psychiatry 1986 ; 148 : 133-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magliano, LFadden, GFiorillo, AMalangone, CSorrentino, DRobinson, A, et al. Family burden and coping strategies in schizophrenia: are key relatives really different to other relatives? Eur Psychiatry 1999 ; 99 : 10-5.Google ScholarPubMed
McCreadie RG, Phillips, KHarvey, AWaldron, GStewart, MBaird, D. The Nithsdale Schizophrenia Surveys. VIII: Do Relatives Want Family Intervention - And Does It Help? Br J Psychiatry 1991 ; 158 : 110-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norusis, J. SPSS for Windows Chicago: SPSS Inc; 1993.Google Scholar
Östman, MHansson, L. The burden of relatives to psychiatric patients – Comparisons between parents, spouses and grown-up children to voluntarily and compulsory admitted psychiatric patients Nord J Psychiatry 1999. In press.Google Scholar
Schene, AHTessler, RCGamache, GM. Instruments measuring family or caregiver burden in severe mental illness Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1994 ; 29 : 228-40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, S. Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences New York; McGraw-Hill: 1956.Google Scholar
Szmukler, GIHerrman, HColusa, SBenson, ABloch, S. A controlled trial of a counseling intervention for caregivers of relatives with schizophrenia Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1996 ; 31 : 149-55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Schizophrenia Fellowship Strategy Document: Families as Partners in Care. 1998.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.