Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-z7ghp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T13:35:15.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olfactory reference syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

C. Sanahuja*
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Mental Health, Fuenlabrada, Spain
A. Espinosa
Affiliation:
Instituto Psiquiatrico Jose Germain, Mental health, Leganés, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The term “olfactory reference syndrome” (ORS), introduced by Pryse-Phillips in 1971, is a persistent false belief and preoccupation with body odor accompanied by significant distress and functional impairment. Nowadays, it is not a distinct syndrome and it is currently classified as a delusional or obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Objectives and aims

Review the history of ORSs classification and discuss why it should be considered as a separate diagnostic in the current health care classification systems.

Methods

Description of a clinical case of a 36-year-old man and review the published articles on ORS by using PubMed database with the keywords: “olfactory reference syndrome”, “chronic olfactory paranoid syndrome”, “hallucinations of smell”, “chronic olfactory paranoid syndrome”, “delusions of bromosis” and “taijin kyofusho”.

Results

The published literature on ORS spans more than a century and provides consistent descriptions of its clinical features but nowadays is not explicitly mentioned in current classification systems as Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). ORS is overlap with different diagnostics such as delusional disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and hypochondriasis.

Conclusions

Right now, it is not clear how the ORSs should best be classified so we consider interesting to include it as a separate diagnosis in our set classifications, since we understand that an adjusted diagnosis is important in order to help patients and therapists to work on a treatment and to establish a more accurate prognosis.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV325
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.