Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:50:35.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Peer to Peer – Support in Severe Mental Disorders: Affective Disorders, Psychosis and Personality Disorder – a Randomized Controlled Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C.I. Mahlke
Affiliation:
Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
T. Bock
Affiliation:
Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are at considerably higher risk for morbidity and mortality than those in the general population. In these diagnoses – a refinement of intervention is required, the user perspective overall is still underrepresented.

Objectives

In mental health Services there is an international trend toward recovery-orientated interventions, like Peer-support (PS) in formal mental health services. There is a raising but still insufficient evidence for it's benefits

Aims

In Germany this is the first try to implement and research peer support services area-wide in psychiatric facilities to provide a low-threshold service that aims individual recovery. This project forms a part of 'psychenet ', a project supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany during 2011 – 2014 and investigates the effect of peer support on psychosocial factors, functioning and hospital admissions.

Methods

In a controlled multi-centre-trial involving 10 hospital facilities in Hamburg − 216 in- and outpatients suffering from affective disorders, psychoses or personality disorders get randomized to either receive additional Peer-Support at most half a year aligned to individual requirements or treatment as usual. A mixed method repeated measurement analysis is conducted.

Results

Subjects refill questionnaires and get rated by clinicians at three points of measurement: Entry of the half year of intervention, after the intervention and in a six month follow up. Psychosocial Outcomes, global functioning, and in and outpatient days were assessed. There is a significant positive Effect for the PS of the primary outcome. Results will be presented

Type
Article: 0165
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.