Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:55:04.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perception of the COVID-19 pandemic by individuals who previously sought psychiatric assistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

O. Boyko*
Affiliation:
Federal State Budgetary Scientific institution “Mental health research center”, Clinical Psychology, Moscow, Russian Federation
T. Medvedeva
Affiliation:
Federal State Budgetary Scientific institution “Mental health research center”, Clinical Psychology, Moscow, Russian Federation
S. Enikolopov
Affiliation:
Federal State Budgetary Scientific institution “Mental health research center”, Clinical Psychology, Moscow, Russian Federation
O. Vorontsova
Affiliation:
Federal State Budgetary Scientific institution “Mental health research center”, Clinical Psychology, Moscow, Russian Federation
O. Kazmina
Affiliation:
Federal State Budgetary Scientific institution “Mental health research center”, Clinical Psychology, Moscow, Russian Federation
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic leads to high levels of stress. Individuals who have previously sought psychiatric assistance are more sensitive.

Objectives

Analysis of the perception of the pandemic by people who have previously sought psychiatric care.

Methods

An internet-survey (20.03.2020 - 13.01.2021) (N=659; 152 – previously sought psychiatric assistance); included SCL-90-R; questions about the levels of anxiety, depression, and fear (assessed on 0-10 scale); question about opinion on COVID-19 pandemic (coded further on the basis of meaning); question about epidemiological situation of COVID-19 in respondents’ places of residence and their social circles.

Results

Individuals who had previously sought psychiatric assistance demonstrated higher levels of anxiety (5,533±2,489 versus 4,774±2,590), depression (4,945±2,926 versus 3,861±2,988), and fear (0,195±0,397 versus 0,278±0,448). They showed roughly equivalent reactions to both anticipated and real danger (z-score GSI of SCL-90-R 0,90 versus 0,90 for anticipated and real danger respectively), the same indicator of the control group (0,53 and 0,65). In statements about the pandemic, they are more often referred to the topic of “positive effects” of pandemic (3,30% versus 0,99%), expressed “curiosity” (5,92% versus 2,37%). They were less drawn to conspiracy (9,87% versus 16,17%), and exploited more readily the topic “about myself” (20,39% versus 13,21%), negative images of “the present” (3,64% versus с 1,58%) and “the future” (15,79% versus 9, 47%), vocabulary of “anger” (5,92% versus 2,17%).

Conclusions

Individuals who had previously sought psychiatric assistance were ambivalent in their attitudes towards pandemic, and tended to concentrate more on feelings and the negative vision of the future. They perceived anticipated danger roughly equivalent to real danger.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.