Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T21:25:22.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Right Prefrontal Deep Tms Effects On Attention Symptoms: Behavioral Outcomes and Electrophysiological Correlates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

H. Shahar
Affiliation:
Life sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
U. Alyagon
Affiliation:
Life sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
A. Lazarovits
Affiliation:
Life sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
A. Hadar
Affiliation:
Life sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
D. Cohen
Affiliation:
Life sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
H. Shalev
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
A. Zangen
Affiliation:
Life sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Despite its high prevalence, the validated treatment for ADHD is chronic administration of psychostimulants, which is associated with side effects and occasionally not tolerated. Deep TMS using special coil designs for targeting neural networks linked with neuropsychiatric disorders, may become a viable alternative.

Objectives

Comparison of rTMS treatment using deep, figure-8 and sham coils on ADHD symptoms.

Methods

In the current randomized, sham-controlled study, adult ADHD patients received 15 daily sessions of high-frequency rTMS directed to the right prefrontal cortex (rPFC), using either deep, figure-8, or a sham coil. ADHD symptoms and cognitive alterations were assessed using the CAARS-INV, self–report questionnaires and performance tests. Additionally, the stop signal task (SST) combined with EEG measures was used to asses behavioural inhibition and ERPs. EEG responses to an inhibitory protocol of paired TMS pulses over the rPFC were measured before and after treatments. A healthy control group was evaluated at baseline for comparison.

Results

Several ADHD symptoms were improved in patients that received dTMS but not standard figure-8 or sham treatment (p=0.007, CAARS; p=0.014, SST). Differences between ADHD patients and healthy controls were demonstrated in ERPs during the SST, and in response to single and paired TMS pulses. The lower amplitudes of ERPs in patients correlated with ADHD symptoms and behavioural inhibition measures.

Conclusions

Repeated stimulation of deep areas in the rPFC has therapeutic potential, where rPFC excitability is impaired in ADHD patients. Ongoing analysis attempts to establish the neurophysiological measures as predictors and biomarkers for effectiveness of dTMS treatment.

Type
Article: 0841
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.