Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:27:35.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should long-term outcome play a role in classification? considerations from european primary care research on affective disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J. Ormel*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although the notion of a nosological category suggests that disorders within the same category have roughly similar etiology and natural history, reality in psychiatry is rather different. Not only between diagnostic categories but also within most diagnostic categories enormous variation in long-term outcome has been observed. This issue is of utmost importance for general practitioners and nurse practitioners given their position in the health care system as primary care provider and referral agent to specialty mental health care. My presentation will address the question what role long-term outcome should play in the classification of mental disorders, especially in the context of primary care and the stepped care model of collaborative care. To this end I will use longitudinal data of mostly depression collected in European general population and primary care studies.

Type
CS01. Core Symposium: European Contribution to the Classification of Mental Disorders
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.