Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T14:03:16.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validating and Adapting the Brief Resilient Coping Scale for Greek Humanitarian Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

M. Bakola
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
S. Reppas
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
A. K. Sakaretsanou
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
K. S. Kitsou*
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
N. Vaitsis
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
S. Angelakou-Vaitsi
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
K. Mavridou
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
A. Veizis
Affiliation:
2Intersos Hellas, Athens
P. Gourzis
Affiliation:
3Department of Psychiatry, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
E. Jelastopulu
Affiliation:
1Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Humanitarian workers (HWs) face significant challenges while providing aid to those in need, often leading to psychological exhaustion and the risk of primary or secondary trauma.

Objectives

Our study aimed to validate and adapt the Greek version of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) for HWs in Greece.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study between September and December 2022. Participants were recruited through a self-administered questionnaire distributed via social media to humanitarian groups. Additionally, the questionnaire was sent via email to these groups’ members, who then forwarded it to their respective networks. The questionnaire included the BRCS, a 4-item measure designed to capture tendencies to cope with stress in a highly adaptive manner. A score of 4-13 points indicates low resilient copers, 14-16 points medium resilient copers and 17-20 points high resilient copers. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to evaluate model fit. Adequate or good fit criteria included a χ2 test p-value ≥ 0.05, Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA) ≤ 0.08, Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) ≤ 0.05, and a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) or Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) ≤ 0.90. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA and SPSS software.

Results

A total of 151 humanitarian workers (76% females), with a mean age of 39.3±10.6 years participated in the study. The mean BRCS score was 65.6/100. Participants were categorized as follows: 34.6% as low resilient copers, 38.6% as medium resilient copers, and 26.8% as high resilient copers. Cronbach’s alpha for the BRCS was 0.84, indicating good internal consistency. CFA results supported the one-factor solution proposed by the original researchers, with acceptable global fit indices: Chi-square p-value = 0.303, SRMR = 0.028, RMSEA = 0.036, CFI = 0.991, TLI = 0.974.

Conclusions

The findings of our study show that the Greek version of BRCS is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to evaluate resilient coping among humanitarian workers in Greece.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.