Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T21:50:22.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kese and Tellak: Cultural Framings of Body Treatments in the ‘Turkish Bath’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Kornelia Hahn*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Salzburg, Rudolfskai 42, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. E-mail: kornelia.hahn@sbg.ac.at

Abstract

Using water for body treatments has an especially long tradition in many cultures and, is deeply intertwined with Roman and Ottoman culture. However, it is clear that today it is not possible to attribute bathing – not even a specific type of bathing, such as the hammam steam bath – to one particular culture (ignoring the obvious problems associated with trying to delineate clearly between such blurred constructs as a specific culture or as a discrete entity). Thus, the ‘Turkish bath’ is a widely used term introduced to Europe in the eighteenth century or applied to various different manifestations. The term reflects the European perception of Turkish bathing culture, primarily connected with bathing within a hammam complex or – as the Turkish term goes – a hammami. Bathing in the hammam-style is rather a Roman cultural practice, an element adapted and integrated in Ottoman culture and readapted thereafter into modern Western culture. It is often believed that these practices are rooted in the cultural history of the present state of Turkey (although ancient ‘Turkish bath’ architecture famously exists in Greece or Albania, too1). Furthermore, the geographical or architectural nexus between mosques and hammams and, also, the temporal order of Islamic culture (in which visiting a hammam before various ritual occasions is required) have often suggested seeing the Turkish bath as a religious custom.

Type
Turkey and Europe: Cultural Aspects
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Castiglia, R. B. F. and Bevilacqua, M. G. (2008) The Turkish baths in Elbasan: architecture, geometry and wellbeing. Nexus Network Journals, 10, pp. 307322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Van Gelder, G. J. (2008) The ‘Hammām’: a space between heaven and hell. Quadernie di Studi Arabi, Nuova Serie, 3, pp. 924.Google Scholar
3.Weitzman, A. T. (2002) Voyeurism and aesthetics in the Turkish bath: Lady Mary’s school of female beauty. Comparative Literature Studies, 39(4), pp. 347359.Google Scholar
4.Breathnach, T. (2004) For health and pleasure: the Turkish bath in Victorian Ireland. Victorian Literature and Culture, 32(1), pp. 159175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Girelli, E. (2007) Transnational orientalism: Ferzan Özpetek’s Turkish dream in Haman (1997). New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 5(1), pp. 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gall, C. (2001) A nation challenged: women’s traditions; back to the old bathhouse: free to laugh once again. Accessed online: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/23/world/nation-challenged-women-s-traditions-back-old-bathhouse-free-laugh-once-again.html (download 19 September 2014).Google Scholar
7.Graiouid, S. (2004) Communication and the social production of space: the hammam, the public sphere and Moroccan women. The Journal of North African Studies, 9(1), pp. 104130.Google Scholar
8.Akşit, E. E. (2011) The women’s quarters in the historical hammam. Gender, Place & Culture. A Journal of Feminist Geography, 18(2), pp. 277293.Google Scholar