No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Memory in Progress
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 September 2014
Abstract
This article traces the evolution in the discourses and representations of victimhood, citing a range of examples from across Europe. Beginning with a macro approach to the question of memory groups, which examines the representation of the victim via collective memory, the article then goes on to discuss how these groups, which are related to historical violence, have presented themselves in the public realm from the 1950s to the present day. Particular attention is paid to the manner in which different memories work together within systems of representation, the function of analogy, metaphor and allegory as rhetorical devices and how one memory often serves as a ‘screen’ or a prism via which to approach another.
- Type
- Focus: Transnational Memory in the Hispanic World
- Information
- Copyright
- © Academia Europaea 2014
References
References and Notes
1.Levy, D. and Sznaider, N. (2006) The Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age (trans. A. Oksiloff) (Philadelphia: Temple University Press), p. 25.Google Scholar
2.Ricoeur, P. (1985) Temps et récit. Tome 3, Le temps raconté (Paris: Seuil, ‘Points essais’), pp. 439–448.Google Scholar
3.Amossy, R. (2010) La présentation de soi. Ethos et identité verbale (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
4.Bourdieu, Pierre (1992) Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
6.Rothberg, M. (2009) Multidirectional Memory. Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford: Stanford University Press), pp. 175–199.Google Scholar
7.Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
9.Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 178.Google Scholar
10.Interview with the author.Google Scholar