Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T16:13:36.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moving Body and the Will to Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2011

Marion Kant
Marion Kant*
Affiliation:
7 Howes Place, Cambridge CB3 0LD, UK. E-mail: marionkant@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From the Renaissance, dance and sport formed the basis of ‘polite’ and ethical behaviour. Both offered a frame within which social norms could be taught and enacted. Scholarship has often concentrated either on the history and aesthetics of dance or on those of gymnastics but neglected the proximity of both forms to each other. This paper focuses on one particular narrative: the intertwining of dance and gymnastics as utopian projects in the arousal of nationalism and creation of a new ‘German’ body. From Friedrich Ludwig Jahn, who sketched the first national and patriotic movement system in Die deutsche Turnkunst 1816, to dance master Franz Anton Roller, gymnastics teacher Adolf Spiess, and dance gurus Rudolf von Laban and Mary Wigman, it will demonstrate how the distinction between dance and gymnastics was constantly re-negotiated; and it argues that twentieth-century Modern Dance developed out of nineteenth-century Turnen and gymnastics. Dance intended to revolutionise German society physically and aesthetically and incorporated spatial concepts and movement sequences that gymnastics systems had already explored. Through their conceptions of motion in time and space, dance and gymnastics created a modern and revolutionary physical practice for the German nation.

Type
Focus: Sports
Information
European Review , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , 30 August 2011 , pp. 579 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. Salzmann, a preacher and pedagogue, founded his school at Schnepfenthal in 1784 and many reform-minded teachers tried out new methods to institutionalise a balanced education. They followed Basedow's philanthropic principles. Among them was GuthsMuths who taught physical education.Google Scholar
2. See Schröder, W. (ed.) (1999) Johann Christoph Gutsmuths und die Gymnastik für die Jugend. Entstehung, Werk, Wirkungsgeschichte (Rudolstadt: Hain).Google Scholar
3.Jahn, F. L. (1810/1938) Von deutschem Volkstum (Jena: Eugen Diederichs Verlag).Google Scholar
4.Jahn, F. L. (1816/1979) Deutsche Turnkunst (Munich: Matthes & Seitz).Google Scholar
5. See Wellner, K. (2008) Der ‘Turnvater’ in Bewegung. Die Rezeption Friedrich Ludwig Jahns zwischen 1933 und 1990. PhD dissertation (University of Munich).Google Scholar
6. See Kohn, H. (1949) Father Jahn's nationalism. The Review Politics, 11(4), pp. 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Eisenberg, C. (1999) ‘English sports’ und deutsche Bürger. Eine Gesellschaftsgeschichte 1800–1939 (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar
8.Langenfeld, H. and Ulfkotte, J. (eds) (1990) Unbekannte Briefe von Friedrich Ludwig Jahn und Hugo Rothstein (Oberwerries: Westfälischer Turnerbund), pp. 178–179.Google Scholar
9. See Jahn, F. L. (1828) Neue Runenblätter (Naumburg), pp. 5–15. Chapters I and II begin with the importance of ‘Gehen’ to the German patriot.Google Scholar
10.Roller, F. A. (1843) Systematisches Lehrbuch der bildenden Tanzkunst und körperlichen Ausbildung von der Geburt an bis zum vollendeten Wachsthume des Menschen… (Landesschule Pforta, Weimar: Voigt).Google Scholar
11.Eisenberg, C. (1999) ‘English sports’ und deutsche Bürger. Eine Gesellschaftsgeschichte 1800–1939 (Paderborn: Schöningh), p. 142.Google Scholar
12.Jahn, F. L. (1847) Deutsche Turnkunst (Berlin: G. Reimer), pp. 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. See Petzsch, C., Reigen and Reigenlied. In: Grove – Oxford Music online (http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:4604/subscriber/article/grove/music/23107?source=omo_gmo&search=quick&q=reigen&pos=12&_start=1firsthit; accessed 8 May 2009).Google Scholar
14.Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds) (1992) The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
15. The language in Spiess's manual was strictly German, no foreign terminology was used.Google Scholar
16. Memorandum submitted by Brown, I. (2004), Session 2003–04 (London).Google Scholar
17.Wigman, M. (1921) Der Tanz als Kunstwerk. Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, 60(57).Google Scholar
18.Wedemeyer-Kolwe, B. (2004) ‘Der neue Mensch.’ Körperkultur im Kaiserreich und in der Weimarer Republik (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann), p. 57.Google Scholar
19.Bode, R. (1922) Ausdrucksgymnastik (Munich: Beck), pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
20.Bode, R. (1925) Rhythmus und Körpererziehung (Jena: E. Diederichs), pp. 15–16. For an excellent portrait of Bode, see L. Guilbert (1999) Danser avec le IIIieme Reich (Paris: Editions Complexe), pp. 28–29.Google Scholar
21.Wigman, M. (1921) Der Tanz als Kunstwerk. Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, 60(57).Google Scholar
22.Laban, R. (1926) Gymnastik und Tanz (Oldenburg i.O.: Gerhard Stalling Verlag).Google Scholar
23.Laban, R. (1920) Die Welt des Tänzers (Stuttgart: Seiffert), p. 9.Google Scholar
24.Fischer-Klamt, G. (1937) Grundsätzliches über Deutsche Tanzerziehung. In: R. Cunz (ed.) Jahrbuch Deutscher Tanz (Berlin: Dom Verlag), p. 92.Google Scholar