Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:45:58.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competing Identities and Turkey’s Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2016

Yale H. Ferguson
Yale H. Ferguson*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University-Newark, New Jersey, USA. E-mail: yhfergus@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One frequent observation about the contemporary world is that the pace of change appears to be accelerating. Turkey is a case in point, and the same is true of Turkey’s relationships with the Middle East, the European Union, and the wider world. All have continued to evolve at such an astonishing rate that almost the only constant has been change itself. Early in the millennium Turkey appeared to have managed the difficult transition from a long era of military control to a relatively stable elected government and liberal democratic values. That expectation eroded in subsequent years under the rule of Prime Minister (now President) Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP), with an unmistakable drift towards a decidedly illiberal democracy – if not outright authoritarianism – and increased violence at home and abroad. At the time of writing (late-July 2016), Turkey has recently experienced a major military coup, a formal state of emergency has been declared, and a sweeping crackdown is occurring that affects virtually every sector of society.

Type
Erasmus Lecture
Information
European Review , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 81 - 95
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.See Idiz, S. (2015) Will Abdullah Gul return to politics? Al-Monitor, 16 June. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/06/turkey-elections-akp-loss-former-president-gul-return.html Google Scholar
2. Friedman, T.L. (2012) Two worlds cracking up. New York Times, 12 June 2012. www.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/opinion/friedman-two-worlds-cracking-up.html.Google Scholar
3.Kurdistan: dream on hold, The Economist, 9 July 2016, 37.Google Scholar
4. Arnago, T. and Yeginsu, C. (2016) Ahmut Davutoglu, Turkey’s Prime Minister, is expected to be replaced. New York Times, 4 May 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/05/world/europe/erdogan-ahmet-davutoglu-turkey-prime-minister-is-expected-to-be-replaced.html Google Scholar
5. Soloman, E. and Hille, K. (2016) Turkey and Russia reassess role in Syria. Financial Times, 1 July 2016. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e126f1aa-3f66-11e6-8716-a4a71e8140b0.html#axzz4GDKxYFDv Google Scholar
6.After the coup, the counter-coup. The Economist, 23 July 2016, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
7. Arango, T. and Yeginsu, C. (2016) Turks can agree on one thing: US was behind failed coup. New York Times, 2 August 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/world/europe/turkey-coup-erdogan-fethullah-gulen-united-states.html.Google Scholar
8.After the coup, the counter-coup. The Economist, 23 July 2016, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
9.After the coup, the counter-coup. The Economist, 23 July 2016, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
10. Keller, J., Mykhyalyshyn, I. and Timur, S. (2016) The scale of Turkey’s purge is nearly unprecedented. New York Times, 2 August 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/02/world/europe/turkey-purge-erdogan-scale.html Google Scholar
11.Turkey and the EU: the pros and cons of membership. The Week, 22 July 2016. http://www.theweek.co.uk/24083/turkey-and-the-eu-the-pros-and-cons-of-membership Google Scholar
12. Beesley, A. (2016) Turkish turmoil after failed coup raises fears for Cyprus talks. Financial Times, 4 August 2016. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/86ec770a-5974-11e6-8d05-4eaa66292c32.html#axzz4GDKxYFDv Google Scholar
13. Robinson, D. and Shrivastava, M. (2016) US and EU leader’s warn Turkey’s Erdogan over post-coup crackdown. Financial Times, 8 July 2016. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b82ef35a-4cc3-11e6-88c5-db83e98a590a.html#axzz4GDKxYFDv Google Scholar
14. Chazan, G. (2016) Germany hits out at Turkish ‘blackmail’ over visas. Financial Times, 1 August 2016. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b82ef35a-4cc3-11e6-88c5-db83e98a590a.html#axzz4GDKxYFDv Google Scholar
15. Cohen, R. (2016) Erdogan in his labyrinth. New York Times, 30 June 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/opinion/erdogan-in-his-labyrinth.html Google Scholar
16. White, J. (2014) Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks, rev. ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press); and J. B. White (2015) The Turkish complex. American Interest, 10(4).Google Scholar
17. White, J. (2014) Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks, rev. ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p. 3.Google Scholar
18. White, J. (2014) Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks, rev. ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press). 8.Google Scholar
19. White, J. (2014) Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks, rev. ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 209.Google Scholar
20. White, J. B. (2015) The Turkish complex. American Interest, 10(4).Google Scholar