Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:25:42.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Environmental Sustainability of the European Union Countries: Collective Identity as a Stratum for Decarbonization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2023

Mehmet Direkli*
Affiliation:
Cyprus International University. North Cyprus via Mersin 10 Türkiye.
Glory Chiyoru Dike
Affiliation:
Cyprus International University. North Cyprus via Mersin 10 Türkiye.

Abstract

To stay within a ‘well below 2°C’ climate change track, the Paris Agreement and goal 13 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for climate action – a global decrease in Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. Arguments in this study are derived from the hypothesis that a collective identity among the EU states would foster collective actions toward reducing global warming. Thus, the objective of this study is to explore how different EU countries (Poland, Italy, and Germany) employ three decarbonization pillars: waste recycling, eco-innovation, and policy innovation (WEP) as a yardstick to mitigate global warming and attain the EU’s ‘net-zero’ emissions by 2050. The study also utilizes annual data collected from the Eurostat indicator from 2014 to 2020. The findings reveal that Germany has the most successful average recycling rate in Europe; 65.5% of the country’s domestic waste is either recycled or reused. On the other hand, Poland is a low performer in eco-innovation. Additionally, an analysis of policy regulations reveals that both Germany and Italy can comply with the policy and regulations of the EU on carbon neutrality. At the same time, Poland, on the other hand, lacks the commitment to carbon neutrality due to its reliance on carbon-intensive coal. Therefore, this study recommends translating EU climatic laws in their simplest forms into local laws. More so, citizens’ behaviour will be further influenced toward environmental sustainability by this collective mindset.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Academia Europaea Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alola, AA, Dike, GC and Alola, UV (2022) The role of legal system and socio-economic aspects in the environmental quality drive of the Global South. Social Indicators Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02920-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alola, AA, Bekun, FV and Sarkodie, SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 685, 702709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergbauer, S (2018) Explaining European identification: the impact of enlargement and the crisis on feelings of european identity among EU citizens. In Explaining European Identity Formation. Cham: Springer, pp. 161238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergbauer, S, Bergbauer, S and Glaeser, M (2018) Explaining European Identity Formation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedenkopf, K (2021) Polish climate policy narratives: uniqueness, alternative pathways, and nascent polarisation. Politics and Governance 9(3), 391400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodnar, O, Cameletti, M, Fasso, A and Schmid, W (2008) Comparing air quality in Italy, Germany and Poland using BC indexes. Atmospheric Environment 42(36), 84128421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbon Market Watch (2018) Understanding the climate action regulation: how effective will the EU’s largest post-2020 climate tool be? Available at: https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Climate-Action-Regulation-briefing-1.pdf (accessed 21 January 2022)Google Scholar
Chilosi, M, Martelli, A and Miranti, A (2019) Environmental law and practice in Italy: Overview. Thomson Reuters Practical Law.Google Scholar
Chistov, V, Aramburu, N and Carrillo-Hermosilla, J (2021) Open eco-innovation: a bibliometric review of emerging research. Journal of Cleaner Production 311, 127627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsche Welle (2021) Illegal waste exports to Poland on the rise. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/polands-growing-problem-with-illegal-european-waste/a-55957224 Google Scholar
Earth.org (2021) Waste management: Germany and Poland. Available at https://earth.org/data_visualization/waste-germany-poland/ Google Scholar
Ekwueme, DC (2020) Footprint of inexhaustible energy usage and financial development on carbon outrush of Eurasian countries. International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2020. doi:10.36880/c12.02363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekwueme, DC, Zoaka, JD and Alola, AA (2021) Carbon emission effect of renewable energy utilization, fiscal development, and foreign direct investment in South Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekwueme, DC, Lasisi, TT and Eluwole, KK (2022) Environmental sustainability in Asian countries: understanding the criticality of economic growth, industrialization, tourism import, and energy use. Energy & Environment, 0958305X221091543.Google Scholar
Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2009) Let’s build a circular economy. Available at: https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/ Google Scholar
Ember (2020). Vision or division? What NECPs tell us about the EU power sector in 2030. Available at: https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/necp7/ Charles Moore. European Programme Lead.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013) Eco-innovation: the key to Europe’s future competitiveness Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/ecoinnovation/en.pdf (accessed 11 May 2022).Google Scholar
European Commission (2019a) The European Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM(2019) 640 final). Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1576150542719&uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN (accessed 6 December 2021)Google Scholar
European Commission (2019b) The EU Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report – POLAND. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eir/pdf/report_pl_en.pdf Google Scholar
European Commission (2021) Communication From The Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; Pathway to a Healthy Planet for All, EU Action Plan: ‘Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/zero-pollution-action-plan/communication_en.pdf (accessed 12 January 2022)Google Scholar
European Environmental Agency (2021) Waste recycling. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/waste-recycling-1/assessment-1 Google Scholar
European Environment Agency (n.d.) Waste recycling in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/waste-recycling-in-europe Google Scholar
European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) (2021) EU progress on climate action – How are the Member States doing? Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698844/EPRS_BRI(2021)698844_EN.pdf Google Scholar
Europorter (2021) Which European Countries Recycle the Most? Available at: https://www.eureporter.co/environment/2021/09/01/which-european-countries-recycle-the-most/ (accessed 12 January 2022)Google Scholar
Euractiv (2022) Expert: speeding up energy transition is the only way out of crisis for Poland. Available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/interview/expert-speeding-up-energy-transition-is-the-only-way-out-of-crisis-for-poland/ Google Scholar
Eurostat (2021) Eco-innovation Index. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/t2020_rt200/default/table?lang=en (accessed 14 January 2022)Google Scholar
Eurostat (2022a) Recycling Rate of Municipal Waste. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/t2020_rt120/default/table?lang=en (accessed 12 January 2022)Google Scholar
Eurostat (2022b) Recycling rate of packaging waste by type of packaging. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_wm020/default/table?lang=en Google Scholar
Eurostat Statistics Explained (2021) Municipal waste statistics. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Municipal_waste_statistics.Google Scholar
Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) (2014) The German Government’s Climate Action Programme 2020: Cabinet Decision of 3 December 2014.Google Scholar
Federal Ministry of Finance (2022) Climate Action Programme 2030: frequently asked questions. Available at: https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/FAQ/climate-protection-faq.html Google Scholar
Forum Energii (2022) Energy transition in Poland Elaboration: Marcin Dusiło, Retrieved from https://www.forum-energii.eu/en/dane-o-energetyce/za-rok-2021 Google Scholar
Fuso Nerini, F, Slob, A, Ericsdotter Engström, R and Trutnevyte, E (2019) A research and innovation agenda for zero-emission European cities. Sustainability 11(6), 1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghisellini, P and Ulgiati, S (2020) Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production 243, 118360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (2021) Renewable energy outlook. Available at: http://www.iea.org/ (accessed 12 January 2022).Google Scholar
International Trade Administration (2022). Poland – country commercial guide. Available at: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/poland-energy-sector Google Scholar
Jansson, C and Carlberg, C (2019) Barriers to eco-innovation: a qualitative study on large manufacturing companies. Master’s Thesis , Uppsala University. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1333528/FULLTEXT01.pdf Google Scholar
Liselotte, J (2021) Climate action in Italy Latest state of play. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690663/EPRS_BRI(2021)690663_EN.pdf Google Scholar
Meyer-Ohlendorf, N (2020) EU Framework for CO2 Removals – Targets and Commitments. Ecologic discussion paper, Berlin.Google Scholar
Meyer-Ohlendorf, N (2021) Carbon Dioxide Removal Strategy for the EU. Berlin: Ecologic Institute. Available at: https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/default/files/publication/2021/30008-CDR-Strategy-EU-2021-web.pdf Google Scholar
Ministry of Climate and Environment (2022) Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 (EPP2040). Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/climate/energy-policy-of-poland-until-2040-epp2040.Google Scholar
Mishra, SK (2021) Environmental laws, policies and regulations: Evidences from Italy. Journal of Global Ecology and Environment 12(3), 2437.Google Scholar
Neligan, A (2018) 2025 Recycling Target: Only 10 EU Countries on Track (No. 28/2018). IW-Kurzbericht.Google Scholar
OECD (2021) Green growth in action: Germany. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greengrowthinactiongermany.htm (accessed 15 January 2022).Google Scholar
Real Instituto Elcano (2021) Italy’s National Recovery and Resiliency Plan’s climate impact. Available at: https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/italys-national-recovery-and-resiliency-plans-climate-impact/ (accessed 10 November 2022).Google Scholar
Samper, JA, Schockling, A and Islar, M (2021) Climate politics in green deals: exposing the political frontiers of the European Green Deal. Politics and Governance 9(2), 816. Available at https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smol, M, Duda, J, Czaplicka-Kotas, A and Szołdrowska, D (2020) Transformation towards circular economy (CE) in municipal waste management system: model solutions for Poland. Sustainability 12(11), 4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobczak, A, Chomać-Pierzecka, E, Kokiel, A, Różycka, M, Stasiak, J and Soboń, D (2022) Economic conditions of using biodegradable waste for biogas production, using the example of Poland and Germany. Energies 15(14), 5239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sözen, S, Orhon, D, Dinçer, H, Ateşok, G, Baştürkçü, H, Yalçın, T and Yağcı, N (2017) Resource recovery as a sustainable perspective for the remediation of mining wastes: rehabilitation of the CMC mining waste site in Northern Cyprus. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 76(4), 15351547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasova, D and Meyer-Ohlendorf, N (2021) Conference on the future of Europe: phasing out fossil fuel subsidy. Available at: https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/default/files/publication/2021/30008-CFE-Phasing-out-fossil-fuel-subsidies-web.pdf (accessed 18 January 2022).Google Scholar
Sustainability (2021) 10 countries tackling plastic pollution. Available at: https://sustainabilitymag.com/top10/10-countries-tackling-plastic-pollution (accessed 20 February 2022).Google Scholar
Tagesspiegel Background (2022) CO2 removal unresolved. Available at: https://background.tagesspiegel.de/energie-klima/co2-entnahme-ungeloest Google Scholar
The Guardian (2021) New EU target to cut carbon emissions by at least 55% disappoints experts. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/21/new-eu-target-to-cut-carbon-emissions-by-at-least-55-disappoints-experts (accessed 12 February 2022).Google Scholar
Thollander, P, Backlund, S, Trianni, A and Cagno, E (2013) Beyond barriers – a case study on driving forces for improved energy efficiency in the foundry industries in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Sweden. Applied Energy 111, 636643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Times (2020) Europe has big plans for a green new deal. Poland’s coal country isn’t so sure. Available at: https://time.com/collection/great-reset/5900740/europe-green-new-deal-poland/ (accessed 29 December 2021).Google Scholar
UNEP (2017) The Emissions Gap Report. A UN Environment Synthesis Report. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Available at: http://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Emissions-Gap-Report-2017.pdf Google Scholar
UNFCCC (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1–33.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2021a) Recycling basics report. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/recycle/recycling-basics (accessed 20 December 2021).Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2021b) Recycling economic information (REI) report. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/smm/recycling-economic-information-rei-report (accessed 22 December 2021).Google Scholar
Vail, BJ (2008) Illegal transnational shipment of waste in the EU: culprits and collaborators in Germany and the Czech Republic. Environmental Politics 17(5), 828834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veum, K and Bauknecht, D (2019) How to reach the EU renewables target by 2030? An analysis of the governance framework. Energy Policy 127, 299307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2022a) GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true Google Scholar
World Bank (2022b) World Development Indicators. Richest European Countries 2022. Available at: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/richest-european-countries Google Scholar
World Population Prospects (2022) Italy Population 2022. Revision. Available at https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/italy-population (accessed 6 November, 2022).Google Scholar
Zoaka, JD, Ekwueme, DC, Güngör, H and Alola, AA (2022) Will financial development and clean energy utilization rejuvenate the environment in BRICS economies? Business Strategy and the Environment.CrossRefGoogle Scholar