Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:47:50.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grasping the Global and the Local in Memorialisation Practices. Some Dialogues and Tensions between Latin America and Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2014

Estela Schindel*
Affiliation:
Universität Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany. E-mail: estela.schindel@uni-konstanz.de

Abstract

Theses about globalised, cosmopolitan, transnational or multilateral memories have received wide circulation over the past few decades. However, their reception in – and pertinence to – Latin America has up to now received little attention within the international debate. This article aims to contribute to this debate by focusing on the particular field of memorialisation discourses and practices. The text posits the existence of a certain global memorialising language, characterised by particular aesthetic and architectonic features. These traits are placed in contrast and in dialogue with the rich memorial tradition that has developed in Argentina since the 1970s, led by the human rights movement and its supporters.

Type
Focus: Transnational Memory in the Hispanic World
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Huyssen, A. (2003) Present Pasts. Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory (Stanford: Stanford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Levy, D. and Sznaider, N. (2006) The Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
3.Rothberg, M. (2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
4.Schindel, E. (2005) Los intelectuales latinoamericanos y el Holocausto: notas para una investigación. In: S. Carreras, (Ed.), Der Nationalsozialismus und Lateinamerika. Institutionen, Repräsentationen, Wissenskonstrukte (II) (Ibero-Online.de 3-II), pp. 235.Google Scholar
5.Terdiman, R. (1993) Present Past: Modernity and the Memory Crisis (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Carrier, P. (2005) Holocaust Monuments and National Memory Cultures in France and Germany since 1989. Origins and Political Function of the Vél d’Hiv in Paris and the Holocaust Monument in Berlin (Oxford, New York: Berghahn).Google Scholar
7.Young, J. (1993) The Texture of Memory. Holocaust Memorials and Meaning (New Haven, London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
9.Longoni, A., Bruzzone, G. (Eds) (2006) El Siluetazo (Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo).Google Scholar
10.Comisión Pro Monumento a las Víctimas del Terrorismo de Estado (2001) Escultura y Memoria (Buenos Aires: Eudeba).Google Scholar
11.Bruzzone, G. (2001) La obra de Boltanski ya realizada por Página/12. Ramona. Revista de artes visuales, 19/20, p. 81.Google Scholar