Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T04:00:41.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marriage in a ‘Culture of Migration’. Emirdag Marrying into Flanders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Christiane Timmerman
Christiane Timmerman*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, CeMIS, Centre for Migration and Intercultural Studies, Lange Nieuwstraat 55, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
*
E-mail: christiane.timmerman@ua.ac.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The persistently high popularity of migration marriages within large immigrant populations in Western Europe is an intriguing phenomenon. Why do so many young people born and raised in Western Europe opt for an unknown partner coming from a region that, although it is where their parents or grandparents came from, is by and large unknown to them personally? This contribution attempts to shed some light on the dynamics of this particular kind of migration which impacts significantly on the social fabric of Western European societies. Our focus here is specifically on the Belgian case, namely the so-called ‘Emirdag connection’. In Belgium, the majority of immigrants with a Turkish background come from the region of Emirdag, in the province of Afyon. Over the last 40 years a close relationship has been established between this region of emigration and a number of Turkish communities in Flanders and Brussels. Over the last decade chain migration became for most the most popular means to enter Belgium; in other words, the majority of newcomers arrived in Belgium as (future) spouses of Belgian residents. This certainly applies to Turkish migration. Particular to the Turkish residents in Belgium, including the second generation, is that the majority still marry a person who grew up in Turkey.

Type
Focus: Labour Migration
Information
European Review , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 585 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Martens, A., Ouali, N., Van de Maele, M., Vertommen, S., Dryon, P. and Verhoeven, H. (2005) Etnische Discriminatie op de Arbeidsmarkt in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest [[Ethnic Discrimination on the Labor Market in Brussels-Capital Region]] (Brussel/Leuven: ULB/K.U. Leuven, Institut de Sociologie/Departement Sociologie, Centre de sociologie du Travail, de l’emploi et de la formation/Afdeling Arbeids- en Organisatiesociologie).Google Scholar
2.Timmerman, C., Vanderwaeren, E. and Crul, M. (2003) The second generation in Belgium. International Migration Review, 37(4), 1065–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. P. Heyse, F. Pauwels, J. Wets and C. Timmerman (2006) Liefde kent geen grenzen: een kwantitatieve en kwalitatieve analyse van huwelijksmigratie vanuit Marokko. Turkije, Oost Europa en Zuid-Oost Azië (OASeS/CeMIS) 275 p.Google Scholar
4.Timmerman, C. (2000) Secular and religious nationalism among young Turkish women in Belgium: education may make the difference. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Soysal, L. (2003) Labor to culture: writing Turkish migration to Europe. South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2/3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kandiyoti, D. (1995) Patterns of patriarchy: notes for an analysis of male dominance in Turkish society. In: Tekeli, S. (ed.) Women in Turkish Society: A Reader (London: Zed Books), pp. 306–318.Google Scholar
7.Timmerman, C. (2006) Gender dynamics in the context of Turkish marriage migration: the case of Belgium. Journal of Turkish Studies, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bailey, A. J. and Boyle, P. (eds) (2004) Special issue: family migration and the New Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2), 229–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Delaney, C. (1991) The Seed and the Soil. Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society (Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press).Google Scholar
10.Hooghiemstra, E. (2003) Trouwen over de Grens. Achtergronden van Partnerkeuze van Turken en Marokkanen in Nederland [[Cross-border Marriage. Background to the Partner Choice of Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands]] (Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau) SCP-publicatie 2003/4.Google Scholar