Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-55759 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-04T04:59:56.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Different Planting Densities on Yield Trends in Oil Palm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. J. Breure
C. J. Breure
Affiliation:
Dami Oil Palm Research Station, Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sixteen years' yield and growth data from an oil palm planting experiment, comparing 56, 110, 148 and 186 palms ha−1, and additional records from a progeny experiment, were used to study the effect of palm age and planting density on carbohydrates incorporated in total above-ground dry matter production per palm (TDMc) and its components: fruit bunch yield (Yc) and vegetative growth (VDMc). The canopy efficiency (e), the amount of carbohydrate incorporated in dry matter production per unit of absorbed radiation per hectare, decreased from the fifth to eighth year then levelled off, but increased once crown expansion was completed. The decrease in e paralleled the expansion of the intercepting leaf surface, and might therefore be linked to an increase in maintenance respiration losses. These losses were apparently not compensated for by an increase in photosynthetic production. The subsequent increase in e in older palms appears to have been due to improved light distribution as a result of an increase in light penetration. The effects of changing levels of light interception and distribution on e were more pronounced at higher density, and resulted in marked differences in changes of TDMc with age between densities. Corresponding differences occurred with Yc, so that the optimum density for current yield decreased until 12 to 13 years from planting, then markedly increased. These findings are discussed in relation to the measures which might be used to increase yield per unit area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 37 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1985). Annual Report of the Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association.Google Scholar
Björkman, O. (1981). Responses to different quantum densities. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology New Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 12A:57–107.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1977). Preliminary results from an oil palm density X fertilizer trial on young volcanic soils in West New Britain. In International Developments in Oil Palm, 192–207 (Eds Earp, D. A. & Newall, W.). Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1982). Factors affecting yield and growth of oil palm tenera in West New Britain. Oléagineux 37:213–228.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1985). Relevant factors associated with crown expansion in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Euphytica 34:161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1986). Parent selection for yield and bunch index in the oil palm in West New Britain. Euphytica 35:65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breure, C. J. (1988). The effect of palm age and planting density on the partitioning of assimilates in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Experimental Agriculture 24:53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breure, C. J. & Corley, R. H. V. (1983). Selection of oil palm for high density planting. Euphytica 32:177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breure, C. J. & Powell, M. S. (1987). The one-shot method of establishing growth parameters in oil palm. Paper presented at the 1987 International Oil Palm Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Breure, C. J., Konimore, J. & Rosenquist, E. A. (1982). Oil palm selection and seed production at Dami Oil Palm Research Station, Papua New Guinea. Oil Palm News 26:6–22.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1973). Effect of planting density on growth and yield of the Oil Palm. Experimental Agriculture 9:169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1976). Photosynthesis and productivity. In Oil Palm Research, 273–283 (Eds Corley, R. H. V, Hardon, J. J. & Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1976). Planting Density. In Oil Palm Research, 273–283. (Eds Corley, R. H. V, Hardon, J. J. & Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. & Breure, C. J. (1981). Measurements in Oil Palm Experiments. Internal report. London: Unilever Plantation Group.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. & Gray, B. S. (1976). Yield and yield components. In Oil Palm Research, 77–86 (Eds Corley, R. H. V, Hardon, J. J. & Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. & Ooi, S. C. (1973). Some evidence for genetically controlled variation in photosynthetic rate of oil palm seedlings. Euphytica 22:48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. & Tan, G. Y. (1971). Analysis of growth of the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). I. Estimation of growth parameters and application in breeding. Euphytica 20:307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, R. H. V., Hew, C. K., Tam, T. K. & Lo, K. K. (1973). Optimal spacing for oil palms. In Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation, 52–69 (Eds Wastie, R. L. & Earp, D. A.). Kuala Lumpur: Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J. & Pearcy, R. W. (1983). Variation in quantum yield for CO2-uptake among C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiology 73:555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. S. (1969). The requirements for assisted pollination in oil palms in Malaysia. In Progress in Oil Palm, 49–66 (Ed. Turner, P. D.). Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Hardon, J. J., Corley, R. H. V. & Ooi, S. C. (1972). Analysis of growth in the oil palm. II. Estimation of genetic variances of growth parameters and yield of fruit bunches. Euphytica 21:257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardon, J. J., Williams, C. N. & Watson, I. (1969). Leaf area and yield in the oil palm in Malaysia. Experimental Agriculture 5:25–52.Google Scholar
Prevot, P. & Duchesne, J. (1955). Densites de plantation pour le palmier a huile. Oléagineux 10:117–122.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, P., Narayanan, R. &: Knecht, J. C. X. (1973). A planting distance experiment of dura palms. In Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation, 72–87 (Eds Wastie, R. L. & Earp, D. A.). Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Spitters, C. J. T. (1986). Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implication for modelling canopy photosynthesis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 38:231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, G. R. (1984a). Techniques in environmental physiology of oil palm. I. Measurements of intercepted radiation. Porim. Bull.Google Scholar
Squire, G. R. (1984b). Light interception, productivity and yield of oil palm. Palm Oil Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar
Syed, R. A. (1979). Studies on oil palm pollination insects. Bulletin of Entomological Research 69:213–224.Google Scholar
Syed, R. A., Law, I. H. & Corley, R. H. V. (1982). Insect pollination of oil palms: introduction, establishment and pollination efficiency of Elaeidobius kamerunicus in Malaysia. Planter, Kuala Lumpur 58:547–561.Google Scholar
Szeicz, G. (1974). Solar radiation for plant growth. Journal Applied Ecology 11:617–636.Google Scholar
Waringa, N. A. (1985). Soil moisture and climate in the West New Britain area. Internal report, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1982). Response to selection for dark respiration rate of mature leaves in Lolium perenne L. and its effect on growth of young plants. Annals Botany 49:313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar