Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:16:38.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Morphactin (Chlorflurenol) on Sex Expression, Yield and Carbohydrates in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

A. K. Bisaria ,
Ranjana Narang ,
G. R. Rastogi  and
V. K. Bhatnagar
A. K. Bisaria
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Hindu College, Moradabad-244001, UP, India
Ranjana Narang
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Hindu College, Moradabad-244001, UP, India
G. R. Rastogi
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Hindu College, Moradabad-244001, UP, India
V. K. Bhatnagar
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Hindu College, Moradabad-244001, UP, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An aqueous solution of a morphactin (chlorflurenol) was applied at 100–1000 ppm to plants of corn (Zea mays L.) variety White Ganga-2 to examine its influence on growth, sex expression, yield and carbohydrates in the grain. At concentrations up to 600 ppm morphactin decreased height, weakened apical dominance, increased the number of tillers and thickness of stem, and caused an appreciable increase in female sex expression, yield and carbohydrates in the grain but reduced them at 800 and 1000 ppm.

Type
Articles
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 97 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AOAC (1975). (12 edn.) Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Biggs, R. H. (1968). Cited in A. Rev. Pl. Physiol (1970), 21, 499.Google Scholar
Bisaria, A. K. (1977a). Canad. J. Bot. 55, 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisaria, A. K. (1977b). Sci. Cult. 43, 47.Google Scholar
Bisaria, A. K. & Bisaria, A. K. Jr (1976). J. exp. Bot. 27, 337.Google Scholar
Bose, T. K. & Nitsch, J. P. (1970). Physiol. Plant 23, 1206.Google Scholar
Friedlander, M., Atsman, D. S. & Galun, E. (1977). Pl. Cell Physiol. 18, 266.Google Scholar
Kaushik, M. P. & Bisaria, A. K. (1972). Pl. Sci. 4, 57.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, H. & Weisbrich, J. (1969). Ber. dt. bot. Ges. Vorter. Ges. Bot. N.F. 3, 103.Google Scholar
Merck, E. (1971). Techn. Inf. 1–11.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. W., Shanan, S. & Guardia, D., M. D. (1969). Bioscience 19, 41.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. W., Cantliffe, D. J. & Shannan, S. (1971). Science 171, 1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, G. (1972). Proc. Adv. Study Inst. Izmir. 1971, 317 (Eds Kaldwey, H. and Varder, V.). Verlag Chemie Weinhein.Google Scholar
Scott, P. C. & Leopold, A. C. (1967). Pl. Physiol. 42, 1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stancovic, D., Savic, S., Javanovic, M. & Milovanovic, S. (1969). Ber. dt. bot. Ges. Vorter. Ges. Bot. N.F. 3, 169.Google Scholar