Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:09:27.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotype-Environment Interactions in Wheat: Effects of Temperature on Coleoptile Length

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. M. Bhatt  and
C. O. Qualset
G. M. Bhatt
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
C. O. Qualset
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Temperature effects on coleoptile development were studied in 18 genotypes of spring and semi-winter wheats, illustrating a simple experimental approach for choosing genotypes and management practices that would minimize genotype–environment interactions for stand establishment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 17 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, R. E. & Pritchett, J. S. (1973). Crop Sci. 13, 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, R. E., Pritchett, J. A. & Patterson, Annette (1968). Crop Sci. 8, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, R. E., Vogel, O. A. & PetersonC. J., Jr. C. J., Jr. (1962). Agron. F. 54, 347.Google Scholar
Allan, R. E., Vogel, O. A., Russell, T. S. & Peterson, C. J. (1965). Crop Sci. 5, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleigh, J. R., Allan, R. E. & Vogel, O. A. (1964). Agron. F. 56, 523.Google Scholar
Chowdhry, A. R. & Allan, R. E. (1966). Crop Sci. 6, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favereau, G., Parado, P., San Juan, A. & Avendano, R. (1968). Agricultura Técnica 28, 103.Google Scholar
Feather, J. T., Qualset, C. O. & Vogt, H. E. (1968). Calif. Agric. 22 (9), 12.Google Scholar
Fick, G. N. & Qualset, C. O. (1975). Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. G. & Cobb, R. D. (1963). Proc. Assoc. Official Seed Anal. 53, 58.Google Scholar
Karmacharya, B. L. (1972). Scient. Rep. Agric. Univ. Norway 51 (28), 1.Google Scholar
Kolp, B. J., Miller, D. G., Pratt, G. A. & Hwang, S. (1967). Crop Sci. 7, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porceddu, E. & Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. T. (1974). Proc. Eucarpia-FAO-IAEA Conference, Polyploidy and Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding, 261. Bari, Italy.Google Scholar
Qualset, C. O., Fick, G. N., Constantin, M. J. & Osborne, T. S. (1970). Science 169, 1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. T. & Porceddu, E. (1973). Genet. Agraria 27, 296.Google Scholar
Sunderman, D. W. (1964). Agron. F. 56, 23.Google Scholar
Woo, S. C. & Konzak, C. F. (1969). In Induced Mutations in Plants, 551. Vienna: Int. Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar