Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T14:27:48.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPARATIVE PHOTOSYNTHESIS, WATER RELATIONS, GROWTH AND SURVIVAL RATES IN JUVENILE CRIOLLO CACAO CULTIVARS (THEOBROMA CACAO) DURING DRY AND WET SEASONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2012

O. ARAQUE ,
R. E. JAIMEZ ,
W. TEZARA ,
I. CORONEL ,
R. URICH  and
W. ESPINOZA
O. ARAQUE
Affiliation:
Universidad de los Andes, Instituto Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Laboratorio de Ecofisiología de cultivos. Mérida, Venezuela
R. E. JAIMEZ*
Affiliation:
Universidad de los Andes, Instituto Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Laboratorio de Ecofisiología de cultivos. Mérida, Venezuela
W. TEZARA
Affiliation:
Universidad Central de Venezuela, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Caracas, Venezuela
I. CORONEL
Affiliation:
Universidad Central de Venezuela, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Caracas, Venezuela
R. URICH
Affiliation:
Universidad Central de Venezuela, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Caracas, Venezuela
W. ESPINOZA
Affiliation:
Universidad de los Andes, Instituto Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Laboratorio de Ecofisiología de cultivos. Mérida, Venezuela
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: rjaimez@ula.ve
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study deals with the ecophysiological response of Criollo cacao cultivars to water deficit during initial establishment phase in an agroforestry system under shade of four timber species using a randomised block design. CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs), water potentials, pressure–volume curves and fluorescence measurements were studied during two dry and wet seasons. Survival rates, basal diameter and leaf concentrations of K, P and N were also determined. All cultivars exhibited 60% reduction in gs with drought, resulting in 73% decrease in A and E. Despite lower A, electron-transport rates were not significantly affected, suggesting the existence of electron sinks. Photochemical quenching is negatively affected by drought in some cultivars, whereas relative quantum yield of photosystem II and non-photochemical quenching remained the same during both the periods. Cultivars with the highest osmotic adjustment coincided with the highest survival rates, whereas growth and leaf nutrient concentrations were similar in all cultivars.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 513 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almeida, A.-A. F., Brito, R. C. T., Aguilar, M. A. G. and De Valle, R. R. (2002). Water relations’ aspects of Theobroma cacao L. clones. Agrotrópica 14:35–44.Google Scholar
Almeida, A.-A. F. and De Valle, R. (2007). Ecophysiology of cacao tree. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19:425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, O. and Macherel, D. (2009). The crucial role of plant mitochondria in orchestrating drought tolerance. Annals of Botany 103:581–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babita, M., Maheswari, M., Rao Arun, L. M., Shanker, K. and Gangadhar Rao, D. (2010). Osmotic adjustment, drought tolerance and yield in castor (Ricinus communis L.) hybrids. Environmental and Experimental Botany 69:243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, N. and Rosenquist, E. (2004). Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany 403:1607–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasimha, D., Daniel, E. V. and Prakash, B. (1991). Influence of environmental factor on photosynthesis in cacao tree. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 55:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. (1989). Breeding methods for drought resistance. In Plants Under Stress, 197–216 (Eds Jones, H. G, Flowers, T. J. and Jones, M. B.). London: Society for Experimental Biology.Google Scholar
Blum, A., Jingxian, Z and Nguyen, H. T. (1999). Consistent differences among wheat cultivars in osmotic adjustment and their relationship to plant production. Field Crop Research 64 (3):287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. and Lockwood, G. (2011). The water relations and irrigation requirements of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.): a review. Experimental Agriculture 47:653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Mare, C., Tondelli, A. and Stanca, A. L. (2008). Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Research 105:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, M., Pereira, J. S., Maroco, J., Rodrigues, M. L., Ricardo, P. P., Osorio, M. L., Carvalho, I., Faria, T. and Pinheiro, C. (2002). How plants cope with water stress in field: photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany 89:907–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conroy, Y., Smillie, J., Kuppers, M., Bevege, D. and Barlow, E. (1986). Chlorophyll a fluorescence and photosynthetic and growth responses of Pinus radiata to phosphorus deficiency, drought stress, and high CO2. Plant Physiology 81:423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Matta, F. (2004). Exploring drought tolerance in coffee: a physiological approach with some insights for plant breeding. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology 16 (1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, D. and Tezara, W. (2009). Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: a critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Annals of Botany 103:561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, P., Veneklass, E., Lambers, H. and Burgess, E. (2008). Leaf water relations during summer water deficit: differential response in turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure among different plant communities in south-western Australia. Plant Cell Environment 31:1791–1802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittler, R. (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science 11:15–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, G., Leuschner, C., Hertel, D., Hölscher, D., Köhler, M., Leitner, D., Michalzik, B., Prihastanti, E., Tjitrosemito, S. and Schwendenmann, L. (2010). Response of cacao trees (Theobroma cacao) to a 13-month desiccation period in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 79:171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praxedes, S., DaMatta, F., Loureiro, M., Ferrấo, M. and Cordeiro, A. (2006). Effects of long-term soil drought on photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in mature robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre var. kouillou) leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany 56:263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premachandra, G. and Joly, R. (1992). Solutes contributing to osmotic potential in young versus mature leaves of cacao seedlings. Journal Plant Physiology 139:355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rada, F., Jaimez, R. E., Garcia-Nuñez, C., Azocar, A. and Ramírez, M. (2005). Water relations in Theobroma cacao var. Guasare under periods of water deficits. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad del Zulia 22 (2):112–120.Google Scholar
Rehem, B. C., Almeida, A. F., Mielke, M. S., Gomes, F. P. and Vallee, R. R. (2010). Photosynthetic and growth responses of Theoborma cacao L. clones to water logging. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 48 (1–2):17–22.Google Scholar
Schulte, P. J. and Hinckley, A. R. (1985). A comparison of pressure-volume curve data analysis techniques. Journal of Experimental Botany 36:1590–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyree, M. T. and Jarvis, P. G. (1982). Water in tissues and cells. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol. 12, 35–77 (Eds Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B. and Ziegler, H). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar