Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T20:23:32.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Elemental Sulphur on Shoot Dry Weight, Nodulation and Pod Yield of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) under Irrigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Tageldin M. Hago  and
M. A. Salama
Tageldin M. Hago
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, PO Box 32, Shambat, Sudan
M. A. Salama
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, PO Box 32, Shambat, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were carried out to study the effects of elemental sulphur on irrigated groundnut. The sulphur was applied at rates of 50, 100 or 150 kg ha−1, either at sowing, at flowering or in two equal splits at sowing and flowering. Shoot dry weight, total sulphur content of leaves, nodule number per plant and pod yield were all significantly increased by sulphur treatment, but nodule dry weight was unaffected. The greatest response lay at or below 50 kg ha−1 applied at sowing. There were no further increases in response above this level.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 93 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bhardwaj, S. P. & Pathak, A. N. (1968). Effect of sulphur on bacterial nodulation of groundnuts. Current Science 37: 351–362.Google Scholar
Bromfield, A. R. (1973). Uptake of sulphur and other nutrients by groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Northern Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 9: 55–58.Google Scholar
Bromfield, A. R. (1975). Effect of ground rock phosphate-sulphur mixture on the yield and nutrient uptake of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Northern Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 11: 265–272.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. & Pratt, P. F. (1961). Methods of Analaysis of Soils, Plants and Water, 195–196. Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California.Google Scholar
Eaton, F. M. (1966). Sulphur. In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils, 444–475 (Ed. Chapman, H. D.). Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1951). Fertilizer trials with groundnut in North Nigeria. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 19: 225–241.Google Scholar
Jordan, H. V. & Ensminger, L. E. (1958). The role of sulphur in soil fertility. Advances in Agronomy 10: 407–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, R. C. N., Gibbons, R. W. & Young, C. T. (1976). Changes in yield, protein, oil and maturity of groundnut cultivars with application of sulphur fertilizers and fungicides. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86: 245–250.Google Scholar
Oke, O. I. (1969). Sulphur nutrition of legumes. Experimental Agriculture 5: 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saalbach, E. (1974). The effect of sulphur, magnesium and sodium on yield and quality of agricultural crops. In Fertilizers, Crop Quality and Economy, 541–589 (Ed. Fernandez, V. H.). Amsterdam, Oxford, New Tork: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Volk, N. J., Tidmore, J. W. & Meadows, D. T. (1945). Supplements to high-analysis fertilizers, with special reference to sulphur, calcium, magnesium and limestone. Soil Science 60: 427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar