Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:23:15.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards the Reliable Prediction of Time to Flowering in Six Annual Crops. IV. Cultivated and Wild Mung Bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. H. Ellis ,
R. J. Lawn ,
R. J. Summerfield ,
A. Qi ,
E. H. Roberts ,
P. M. Chay ,
J. B. Brouwer ,
J. L. Rose ,
S. J. Yeates  and
S. Sandover
R. H. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AD, England
R. J. Lawn
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, The Cunningham Laboratory, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4067, Australia
R. J. Summerfield
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AD, England
A. Qi
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AD, England
E. H. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AD, England
P. M. Chay
Affiliation:
CSIRO Davies Laboratory, Private Mail Bag, PO Aitkenvale, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia
J. B. Brouwer
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Victoria 3401, Australia
J. L. Rose
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Hermitage Research Station, via Warwick, Queensland 4370, Australia
S. J. Yeates
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, PO Box 1346, Katherine, Northern Territory 0851, Australia
S. Sandover
Affiliation:
Western Australia Department of Agriculture, PO Box 19, Kununurra Regional Office, Western Australia 6743
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eight genotypes of cultivated mung bean, black gram and rice bean (Vigna mungo, Vigna radiata ssp. radiata and Vigna umbellata, respectively) were sown at six sites in Australia on various dates in order to provide a range of photothermal environments. In addition, four accessions of the related wild species Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata were sown on five occasions. Times from sowing to first flowering (f) varied between environments from 34 to 317 d; pre-flowering temperature and photoperiod means ranged from 12.7° to 29.1°C and from 11.8 to 15.5 h d−1. No effect of photoperiod was detected on rate of progress towards first flowering (1/f) in four genotypes, but in each case a significant positive relation was detected between 1/f and mean temperature. These simple thermal time relations did not differ significantly among these four genotypes; the common base temperature was 7.9°C. In two genotypes observations were well described by a thermal response plane when the mean photoperiod was less than 13 h d−1 (p < 0.01) but photoperiods greater than 14 h d−1 delayed flowering. In each of the remaining genotypes the observations were best described by photothermal planes, that is, 1/f was modulated by temperature and photoperiod. Predictions from the models based on our data were in good agreement with the times to first flowering observed in three genotypes in an earlier controlled environment study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 31 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aggarwal, V. C. & Poehlman, J. M. (1977). Effects of photoperiod and temperature on flowering in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Euphytica 26:207–219.Google Scholar
Angus, J. F., Cunningham, R. B., Moncur, M. W. & MacKenzie, D. H. (1981). Phasic development of field crops. I. Thermal response in the seedling phase. Field Crops Research 3:365–378.Google Scholar
Bashandi, M. M. & Poehlman, J. M. (1974). Photoperiod response in mungbeans (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Euphytica 23:691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Lawn, R. J., Summerfield, R. J., Qi, A., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L. & Yeates, S. J. (1994). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. III. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Experimental Agriculture 30:17–29.Google Scholar
Fernandez, G. C. J. & Chen, H. K. (1989). Temperature and photoperiod influence reproductive development of reduced photoperiod-sensitive mungbean genotypes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114:204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodspeed, M. J. (1975). Computer routine for solar position, daylength and related quantities. Technical Memorandum No. 75/11. CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources.Google Scholar
Imrie, B. C. & Lawn, R. J. (1990). Time to flowering of mung bean (Vigna radiata) genotypes and their hybrids in response to photoperiod and temperature. Experimental Agriculture 26:307–318.Google Scholar
Lawn, R. J. (1979). Agronomic studies on Vigna spp. in south eastern Queensland. I. Phenological response of cultivars to sowing date. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30:855–870.Google Scholar
Lawn, R. J. & Ahn, C. S. (1985). Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek/Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). In Grain Legume Crops, 584–623 (Eds Summerfield, R. J. and Roberts, E. H.). London: William Collins.Google Scholar
Lawn, R. J. & Imrie, B. C. (1991). Crop improvement for tropical and subtropical Australia: designing plants for difficult climates. Field Crops Research 26:113–139.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. R., Ho, L., Liu, T. D., Wu, H. B. F. & Oyer, E. B. (1975). Photoperiodism of mung bean and four related species. HortScience 10:486–487.Google Scholar
Rawson, H. M. & Craven, C. L. (1979). Variation between short-duration mungbean cultivars (Vigna radiata L.) Wilczek) in response to temperature and photoperiod. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 22:127–136.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. H. & Summerfield, R.J. (1987). Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In Manipulation of Flowering, 17–50 (Ed. Atherton, J. G.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Sen Gupta, J. C. & Mukherji, D. K. (1949). Studies on the physiology of growth and development of mung (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.). (a) Effect of the time of sowing, (b) Vernalization and photoperiodism. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 23:461–470.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Roberts, E. H. (1985). Vigna radiata. In Handbook of Flowering, Volume I, 165–170 (Ed. Halevy, A. H.). Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Lawn, R. J. (1987). Environmental modulation of flowering in mung bean (Vigna radiata): a reappraisal. Experimental Agriculture 23:461–470.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Lawn, R. J. (1988). Environmental modulation of flowering in mung bean (Vigna radiata): further reappraisal for diverse genotypes and photothermal regimes. Experimental Agriculture 24:75–88.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H., Ellis, R. H. & Lawn, R. J. (1991). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. I. The development of simple models for fluctuating field environments. Experimental Agriculture 27:11–33.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Lawn, R. J., Qi, A., Ellis, R. H., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L., Shanmugasundaram, S., Yeates, S. J. & Sandover, S. (1993). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. II. Soyabean (Glycine max). Experimental Agriculture 29:253–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar