Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T04:53:21.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the evolution of mixed P and M populations maintained at high temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Phillip K. Kiyasu
Affiliation:
Division of Biology & Medicine, Brown University, Providence, R.I. 02912, U.S.A.
Margaret G. Kidwell
Affiliation:
Division of Biology & Medicine, Brown University, Providence, R.I. 02912, U.S.A.

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ability of hybrid dysgenesis P factors to survive and multiply under conditions of strong negative sterility selection was studied in mixed P and M laboratory cultures. Eight populations were initiated with varying proportions of P and M strains. Mixed populations and controls were maintained for seventeen generations at 27 °C, a temperature sufficiently high to induce maximum frequencies of sterility in dysgenic hybrids. The two components of dysgenesis, P factor activity and cytotype, were monitored every generation for the first ten generations and intermittently thereafter. With one exception, all the mixed populations evolved to the P type indicating that P factors can survive and multiply, despite low initial frequency and strong negative selection against dysgenic hybrids. However, the average level of P factor activity attained at equilibrium was considerably lower than that of the P strain control population maintained under the same conditions. It was also lower than the equilibrium level of P factor activity attained in a similar experiment carried out at a lower temperature, suggesting that selection favoured P factors with weak rather than strong sterility potential.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

Bingham, P. M., Kidwell, M. G. & Rubin, G. M. (1982). The molecular basis of P-M hybrid dysgenesis: the role of the P element, a P-strain-specific transposon family. Cell 29, 9951004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregliano, J. C. & Kidwell, M. G. (1983). Hybrid dysgenesis determinants. In Mobile Genetic Elements (ed. Shapiro, J. A.), pp. 363410. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Engels, W. R. (1979). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: rules of inheritance of female sterility. Genetical Research 33, 219236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, W. R. (1981). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila and the stochastic loss hypothesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium of Quantitative Biology 45, 561565.Google Scholar
Engels, W. R. (1983). The P family of transposable elements in Drosophila. Annual Review of Genetics 17, 315344.Google Scholar
Engels, W. R. & Preston, C. R. (1981). Characteristics of a neutral strain in the P-M system of hybrid dysgenesis. Drosophila Information Service 56, 3537.Google Scholar
O'Hare, K. & Rubin, G. M. (1983). Structures of P transposable elements of Drosophila melanogaster and their sites of insertion and excision. Cell 34, 2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidwell, M. G. (1979). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the relationship between the P-M and I-R interaction system. Genetical Research 33, 205217.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. G. (1983 a). Evolution of hybrid dysgenesis determinants in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.) 80, 16551659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidwell, M. G. (1983 b). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: factors affecting chromosomal contamination in the P-M system. Genetics 104, 317341.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. G. (1979). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: sterility resulting from gonadal dysgenesis in the P-M system. Genetics 92, 11271140.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. G. & Novy, J. B. (1979). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: Sterility resulting from gonadal dysgenesis in the P-M system. Genetics 92, 11271140.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. G., Kidwell, J. F. & Sved, J. A. (1977). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: a syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility and male recombination. Genetics 86, 813833.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. G., Novy, J. B. & Feeley, S. M. (1981). Rapid unidirectional change of hybrid dysgenesis potential in Drosophila. Journal of Heredity 72, 3238.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. E., Kidwell, M. G. & Fausto-Sterling, A. (1979). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: morphological and cytological studies of ovarian dysgenesis. Genetics 92, 11411152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, M. J., Raymond, J. D., Johnson, N. A. & Fahey, T. M. (1984). A comparison of mutation rates for specific loci and chromosome regions in dysgenic hybrid males of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106, 8594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed