Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T17:13:30.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-random chromosomal distribution of Ac-like sequences in inbred maize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Mitrick A. Johns*
Affiliation:
Plant Molecular Biology Center, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, USA
Susan I. Fuerstenberg
Affiliation:
Plant Molecular Biology Center, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, USA
Cheryl A. Hennelly
Affiliation:
Plant Molecular Biology Center, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, USA
*
* Corresponding author.

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have searched for evidence of historical transpositions of Ac-like sequences in four standard maize lines using the recombinant-inbred mapping technique. Thirty restriction fragments were mapped using EcoR I, EcoR V, and Hind III. The four inbreds contained 24 fragments which mapped to independent sites within each line; the other 6 fragments probably represented multiple mappings of the same element. Possible allelism between lines reduced this number to a minimum of 15 different sites containing Ac-like elements. The distribution of these sequences does not fit the expected Poisson distribution; instead, an unusually large number of these elements were found on chromosome 4. The other sequences were scattered randomly throughout the genome. With few exceptions, each line had sequences in different locations; however, the overall distribution of Ac-like sequences was similar for all lines. The non-random distribution of Ac-like sequences suggests that they have undergone a limited number of transpositions in maize; the distribution is incompatible with either complete immobility or frequent transposition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

Barclay, P. C. & Brink, R. A. (1954). The relation between Modulator and Activator in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 40, 11181126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennetzen, J. L. (1987). Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize. Molecular and General Genetics 208, 4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, B., Archer, K. & Burr, F. A. (1987). Activation of Spm with a chemical mutagen. In Plant Transposable Elements (ed. Nelson, O.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Burr, B., Burr, F. A., Thompson, K. H., Albertson, M. C. & Stuber, C. W. (1988). Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics 118, 519526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, V. & Walbot, V. (1986). DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 83, 17671771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, V. L., Talbert, L. E., Raymond, F. (1988). Sequence, genomic distribution and DNA modification of a Mul element from non-Mutator maize stocks. Genetics 119, 951958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. (1983). The population dynamics of transposable elements. Genetical Research 42, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Greenblatt, I. M. & Dellaporta, S. L. (1987). Transposition of Ac from the P locus of maize into unreplicated chromosomal sites. Genetics 117, 109116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomet, P. S., Wessler, S. & Dellaporta, S. L. (1987). Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is associated with its DNA modification. EMBO Journal 6, 295302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doerschug, E. B. (1973). Studies of Dotted, a regulatory element in maize. I. Induction of Dotted by chromatid breaks. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 43, 182189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooner, H. K. & Belachew, A. (1989). Transposition pattern. of the maize element Ac from the bz-m2(Ac) allele. Genetics 122, 447457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, M. D., Stuber, C. W. & Wendel, J. F. (1987). Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116, 113125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedoroff, N., Wessler, S. & Shure, M. (1983). Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds. Cell 35, 235242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, A. P. & Vogelstein, B. (1983). A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Analytical Biochemistry 132, 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, J. R. S. & Sastry, G. R. K. (1974). Controlling elements in maize. Annual Review of Genetics 8, 1550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt, I. M. (1966). Transposition and replication of Modulator in maize. Genetics 53, 361369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt, I. M. (1968). The mechanism of Modulator transposition in maize. Genetics 58, 585597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt, I. M. (1974). Movement of Modulator in maize: a test of an hypothesis. Genetics 77, 671678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, I. M. (1984). A chromosomal replication pattern deduced from pericarp phenotypes resulting from movements of the transposable element. Modulator, in maize. Genetics 108, 471485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F. & Sambrook, J. (1982). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Habor Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, B. (1947). Cytogenetic studies of maize and Neurospora. Carnegie Institution of Washington Yearbook 46, 146151.Google Scholar
McClintock, B. (1951). Chromosome organization and gene expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 16, 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, B. (1964). Aspects of gene regulation in maize. Carnegie Institution of Washington Yearbook 63, 592602.Google Scholar
McClintock, B. (1965). Components of action of the regulators Spm and Ac. Carnegie Institution of Washington Yearbook 64, 527536.Google Scholar
McClintock, B. (1978). Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Genetics Symposium 10, 2548.Google Scholar
McClintock, B. (1984). The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226, 792801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, E. A. & Langley, C. H. (1983). Transposable elements in Mendelian populations. II. Distribution of three copia-like, elements in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 104, 473483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, E., Charlesworth, B. & Langley, C. H. (1987). A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 49, 3141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottinger, J. P., Johns, M. A. & Freeling, M. (1984). Mutations of the Adh1 gene in maize following infection with barley stripe mosaic virus. Molecular and General Genetics 195, 367369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peschke, V., Phillips, R. L. & Gengenbach, B. G. (1987). Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science 238, 804806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, P. A. (1970). The En mutable system in maize. III. Transposition associated with mutational events. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 40, 367377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, P. A. & Salamini, F. (1986). A search for active mobile elements in Iowa stiff stalk synthetic maize population and some derivatives. Maydica 31, 163172.Google Scholar
Pohlman, R., Fedoroff, N. V. & Messing, J. (1984). The nucleotide sequence of the maize controlling element Activator. Cell 37, 635643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhoades, M. M. & Dempsey, E. (1982). The induction of mutable systems in plants with the high-loss mechanism. Maize Genetics Coop Newsletter 56, 2126.Google Scholar
Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Soiman, K. M., Jorgenson, R. A. & Allard, R. W. (1984). Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barely: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81, 80148018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, D. & Dennis, E. (1986). Transposase activity of the Ac controlling element in maize is regulated by its degree of methylation. Molecular and General Genetics 205, 476482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, E. (1975). Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. Journal of Molecular Biology 98, 503517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprague, G. F. & McKinney, H. H. (1966). Aberrant Ratio: an anomaly in maize associated with virus infection. Genetics 54, 12871296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuber, C. W. & Edwards, M. D. (1986). Genotype selection for improvement of quantitative traits using molecular marker loci. Proceedings of the 41st annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference, pp. 7083.Google Scholar
Walbot, V. (1986). Reactivation of somatic instability in an inactive Mutator stock by treatment of seed with gamma rays. Maize Genetics Coop Newsletter 60, 124.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar