Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T10:24:18.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postmeiotic segregation in locus ‘46’ of Ascobolus immersus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

W. Gajewski
Affiliation:
Department of General Genetics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
A. Paszewski
Affiliation:
Department of General Genetics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
A. Dawidowicz
Affiliation:
Department of General Genetics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
B. Dudzińska
Affiliation:
Department of General Genetics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

White-spored mutants of Ascobolus immersus were used to study postmeiotic segregation within a gene. It was found that in two-point crosses between mutants showing postmeiotic segregation, polarization in recombinant asci resulting from this type of segregation resembled that in normal (even-type) conversion. However, the ratio of recombinant asci with even segregation (6:2 asci) to those with odd segregation (7:1 asci) was much higher than might have been expected on the basis of the frequencies of various recombinant asci found in crosses between the same mutants and the wild-type strain. It seems that none of the current models of recombination gives a satisfactory explanation of the results obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

REFERENCES

Case, M. & Giles, N. H. (1964). Allelic recombination in Neurospora; tetrad analysis of a three-point cross within the pan-2 locus. Genetics 49, 529540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, S. (1966). Quantitative implications of the DNA-repair model of gene conversion. Genetics 53, 475485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, S. & Yu-Sun, C. C. C. (1967). Gene conversion in the Pasadena strain of Ascobolus immersus. Genetics 55, 3947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, P. J. & Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1964). A polaron model of genetic recombination by the formation of hybrid DNA. Nature, Lond. 201, 10521054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1964). A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genet. Res. 5, 282304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitani, Y., Olive, L. S. & El-Ani, A. S. (1962). Genetics of Sordaria fimicola. V. Aberrant segregation at the g locus. Am. J. Bot. 49, 697706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissouba, P. (1961). Mise en évidence d'une unité génétique polarisée et essai d'analyse d'un cas d'interférence negative. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Veget. I, 44, 641720.Google Scholar
Lissouba, P., Mousseau, J., Rizet, G. & Rossignol, J. L. (1962). Fine structure of genes in the ascomcyete Ascobolus immersus. Adv. Genet. 11, 343380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paszewski, A. & Surzycki, S. (1964). ‘Selfers’ and high mutation rate during meiosis in Ascobolus immersus. Nature, Lond. 204, 809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paszewski, A., Surzycki, S. & Mańkowska, M. (1966). Chromosome maps in Ascobolus immersus (Rizet's strain). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 35, 181188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossignol, J. L. (1964). Phénomènes de recombinaison intragénique et unité fonctionnelle d'un locus chez l'Ascobolus immersus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris.Google Scholar
Surzycki, S. (1964). Aberrant segregation in tetrads of Ascobolus immersus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1963). A theory of crossing-over by means of hybrid deoxyribo-nucleic acid. Nature, Lond. 199, 10341040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1967). Secondary crossing-over. Nature, Lond. 215, 13521359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. & Hastings, P. J. (1965). The analysis of genetic recombination on the polaron hybrid DNA model. Genet. Res. 6, 2792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed