Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T18:56:35.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection for leukocyte counts in mice*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

C. K. Chai
Affiliation:
The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By directional selection for total leukocyte counts from a hybrid mouse stock we have gradually established two lines of mice, LLC (Low Leukocyte Count) and HLC (High Leukocyte Count), which differ both in total and in differential leukocyte counts. A randombred line (RLC) is also being concurrently maintained. Other variations between these lines of mice are in body weight, in the frequencies of coat color genes, reproductive performance, and resistance to X-irradiation. The LLC line was comparatively low in the latter two physiological parameters, and high in variation of body weight.

Responses to selection for high and low leukocyte counts were asymmetrical. In the first two generations, responses were irregular; thereafter they were large in the low line (LLC) for two or three generations and then became small in comparison with those of the high line (HLC). At eleven generations of selection, the mean leukocyte count of HLC is about three times that of LLC Responses of the different cell types were proportional to their individual percentages of the total counts. There were sexual differences in the counts of total and individual cell types. Selection for total leukocyte counts affected the proportions of the individual cell types. Heritability estimates based on selection differential and response and on sib relationships yielded values ranging from 0·15 to 0·39.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Bray, D. F., Bell, A. E. & King, S. C. (1962). The importance of genotype by environment interaction with reference to control populations. Genet. Res. 3, 282302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, C. K. (1956). Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice. 1. Hybridization and maternal influence. Genetics, 41, 157164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, C. K. (1957). Leukopenia: an inherited character in mice. Science, N.Y. 126, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chai, C. K. (1960). Endocrine variation: heritability of iodine metabolism in the thyroids of mice. Biometrical Genetics (O., Kempthorne, ed.). Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1961). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. New York: The Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Gowen, J. W. (1943). Factors affecting genetic resistance of mice to mouse typhoid. J. infect. Dis. 73, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Russell, E. S., Neufeld, E. F. & Higgins, C. T. (1951). Comparison of normal blood picture of young adults from 18 inbred strains of mice. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 78, 761766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, J. A. & Schlager, G. (1962). Selection for leukocyte count in the house mouse and some physiological effects. Genetics, 47, 11991217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed