Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T07:30:49.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Basal Cambrian reworked phosphates from Spitsbergen (Norway) and their implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. L. Kidder
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
K. Swett
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, U.S.A.

Abstract

Several phosphatic zones are associated with the oldest remains of shelly fossils on the arctic island of Spitsbergen. The phosphate occurs as reworked nodules and layers associated with a disconformity. A gap in the acritarch biostratigraphic record supports a hiatus associated with the phosphatic zone. Palaeogeographic positions for Svalbard, both (1) as a single unit, and (2) as three isolated parts prior to Caledonian tectonism are consistent with conditions favourable to at least minimal amounts of upwelling. However, upwelling may not have been a prerequisite for development of these phosphate deposits. These phosphates were deposited in a nearshore shelf environmnt which contrasts with the outer shelf setting of many modern and recent phosphate deposits.

Geochemistry of the Lower Cambrian phosphates of Spitsbergen varies with the mode of phosphate occurrence. Concretionary phosphate clasts are chemically zoned such that their centres are enriched in P2O5 and CaO and are depleted in A12O3, SiO2, and K2O. Laminated and thinly bedded phosphate shows no chemical zonation within clasts. Phosphate cements are the most pure with respect to calcium phosphate.

This thin phosphatic zone of Svalbard is minor when compared with thicker and richer Lower Cambrian phosphate deposits, particularly those in the Soviet Union, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Coupled with the near absence of phosphate in some extensive Proterozoic to Lower Palaeozoic successions (e.g. western North America), this emphasizes the fact that widespread Lower Cambrian phosphate deposition was unevenly distributed. Althouth the Upper Proterozoic and Lower Cambrian are characterized by enhanced phosphogenesis, palaeogeographic position was also apparently critical to deposition of phosphatic sediments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atlas, E. L. 1979. Solubility controls of carbonate–fluoro-apatite in seawater. Report on the Marine Phosphatic Sediments Workshop, Honolulu, 1979 (ed. Burnett, W. C., Sheldon, R. P.), pp. 1820.Google Scholar
Baturin, G. N. 1982. Phosphorites on the Sea Floor. Developments in Sedimentology 33, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 343 pp.Google Scholar
Bentor, Y. K. 1980. Phosphorites – the unsolved problems. In Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 29, (ed. Bentor, Y. K.), pp. 318.Google Scholar
Birch, G. F. 1980. A model for penecontemporaneous phosphatization by diagenetic and authigenic mechanisms from the western margin of southern Africa. In ed. Bentor, Y. K., Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 29, pp. 79100.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1980. The Lower Cambrian transgression and glauconite–phosphate facies in western Europe. Journal of the Geological Society of London 137, 695703.Google Scholar
Burnett, W. C. & Veeh, H. H. 1977. Uranium-series disequilibrium studies in phosphorite nodules on the W. coast of S. America. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 41, 755–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyce, M. R. & Friedman, G. M. 1975. Significance of authigenic K-feldspar in Cambro–Ordovician carbonate rocks of the Pro-Atlantic shelf in North America. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 45, 808–21.Google Scholar
Conant, L. C. & Swanson, V. E. 1961. Chattanooga Shale and related rocks of central Tennessee and nearby areas. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 357, 91 pp.Google Scholar
Cook, P. J. & Shergold, J. H. 1984. Phosphorus, phosphorites and skeletal evolution at the Pre-cambrian-Cambrian boundary. Nature 308, 231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B. & Wright, N. J. R. 1979. Alternative hypothesis for the pre-Carboniferous evolution of Svalbard. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 167, 90117.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Gaskell, B. A., Heafford, A. P., Lind, E. K. & Perkins, P. J. 1984. Outline of arctic post-Silurian continental displacements. In Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin (ed. Spencer, A. M. et al. ) pp. 137–48. Norwich: Norwegian Petroleum Society/Graham & Trotman.Google Scholar
Ingle, J. C. 1982. Paleo-oceanographic significance of Cretaceous and Cenozoic diatomites along eastern Pacific margin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 66, 584.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. L. 1985. Petrology and origin of phosphate nodules from the Midcontinent Pennsylvanian epicontinental sea. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 55, 809–16.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H. & Swett, K. 1987. Micropaleontology across the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary in Spitsbergen. Journal of Paleontology 61, 898926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinky, J. M., Knoll, A. H. & Swett, K. 1983. New taxa in the Lower Cambrian of Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, and their biostratigraphic significance. Geological Society of American Abstracts with Programs 15, 6, 634.Google Scholar
Martens, C. S. & Harriss, R. C. 1970. Inhibition of apatite precipitation in the marine environment by magnesium ions. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 34, 621–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, G. W. & Veeh, H. H. 1980. Holocene phosphorite on the East Australian continental margin. Nature 288, 690–2.Google Scholar
Parrish, J. T., Ziegler, A. M., Scotese, C. R., Humpheville, R. G. & Kirschvink, J. L. 1986. Early Cambrian palaeogeography, palaeoceanography, and phosphorites. In Phosphate Deposits of the World, Vol. 1, Proterozoic and Cambrian Phosphorites. ed. (Cook, P. J. and Shergold, J. H.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 280–94.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R. 1984. An introduction to this volume: Paleozoic paleomagnetism and the assembly of Pangea. In Plate Reconstruction from Paleomagnetism: Interim Report of Working Group 2 on Phanerozoic Plate Motions and Orogenesis (ed. Van der Voo, R., Scotese, C. R., Bonhommet, N.), pp. 110. Washington. D.C.: American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., Hurley, A. M. & Briden, J. C. 1981. Phanerozoic Paleocontinental World Maps. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102 pp.Google Scholar
Swett, K. 1968. Authigenic feldspars and cherts resulting from dolomitization of illitic limestones: a hypothesis. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 38, 128–35.Google Scholar
Swett, K. 1981. Cambro–Ordovician strata in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen and their paleotectonic significance. Geological Magazine 118, 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swett, K. & Crowder, R. K. 1982. Primary phosphatic oolites from the Lower Cambrian of Spitsbergen. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 52, 587–93.Google Scholar
Swett, K. & Smit, D. E. 1972. Paleogeography and depositional environments of the Cambro–Ordovician shallow marine facies of the North Atlantic. Geological Society of American Bulletin 83, 3223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, P. R., Mitchum, R. M. & Thompson, S. 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level. Part IV. Global cycles of relative changes of sea level. In Seismic Stratigraphy Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 26, p. 83.Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A. 1968. Acritarchs of the Precambrian and Lower Cambrian deposits of Estonia. In Problematics of Riphean and Cambrian Layers of the Russian Platform, Urals and Kasakhstan, (ed. Volkova, N. A. et al. ) Transactions of the Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R. 188, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 836 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A. 1971. Lower Cambrian ‘Hystrichosphaerids’. Journal of Palynology 7, 26–9.Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A., Gnilovskaya, M. B., Lendzion, K., Kirjanov, V. V., Palij, V. M., Pashkyavichene, L. T., Piskun, L. V., Posti, E., Rozanov, A. Yu., Urbanek, A., Fedonkin, M. A. & Jankauskas, T. V. 1979. Upper Precambrian and Cambrian Paleontology of East European Platform. Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R. Geological Institute, Moscow, Nauka, 210 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar