22 August 2024: Due to technical disruption, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working to restore services and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
So much confusion has occurred in the past over the identification of the genera which we have been discussing, that a list of some figured species from the Jurassic rocks, arranged in their proper sub-genera, may be useful. The only previous attempt at a list of this sort, so far as I am aware, is that by Professor Rollier, who was only able to enumerate five species. He called all these Beushausenia, but two are not Beushausenias but true Parallelodons, while a third belongs to a different genus.
page 337 note 1 1912, “Fossiles nouveaux ou peu connus du Jura, etc.,” M.S. Pal. Suisse, vol. xxxviii, p. 56.Google Scholar
page 343 note 1 1837, Petrefacta Germaniae, p. 141, pl. cxxi, figs. 11b and 10a.Google Scholar
page 343 note 2 1892, “Et. sur les moll. des Couches coralligènes inf. Jura Bernois,” M.S. Pal. Suisse, p. 282, pl. xxx, fig. 16.Google Scholar
page 343 note 3 1897, “Et. sur les moll. de l' Oxfordien sup. et moy. du Jura Bernois” (part 2), ibid., p. 107, pl. xiv, figs. 4 a−c.
page 344 note 1 1925, Proc. Dorset F. C., vol. xlvi, p. 128, pl. i, figs. 7a and b, and pl. ii, figs. 1a, b, and 2.Google Scholar
page 344 note 2 1923, op. cit., p. 95.
page 344 note 3 1927, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. ccxvi, B, pl. ii, fig. 8.Google Scholar
page 344 note 4 Figured by Deshayes, 1860, op. cit., vol. i, atlas, pl. lxix, figs. 11 and 15.
page 346 note 1 1825, Blainville, de, in Dict. Sci. Nat., vol. xxxiv, p. 319, pl. xci, fig. 2.Google Scholar
page 346 note 2 1929, Mon. Brit. Corallian Lamellibranchia, Pal. Soc., p. 36.Google Scholar
page 346 note 3 1929, loc. cit., pl. i, figs. 3–5.
page 349 note 1 1850, “Mon. Permian Foss. England,” Pal. Soc., pp. 172, 173, and pl. xv, figs. 1–12.Google Scholar
page 349 note 2 1855, “Arca pulla Terq.,” Mém. Soc. Géol. France, [2] vol. v, p. 307, pl. xxi, figs. 1a and b.Google Scholar
page 349 note 3 All founded by Gray.
page 349 note 4 1870, Am. Journ. Conch., vol. v, p. 97 (nomen nudum), figd. 1885, Whitfield, loc. cit., pl. xii, figs. 8–10.Google Scholar
page 350 note 1 1855, Sedgwick and McCoy, Brit. Pal. Foss., pl. 1k, fig. 3.Google Scholar
page 350 note 2 1855, Bull. Soc. Géol. France [2], vol. xii, p. 989, pl. xxvi, fig. 12. But this may possibly be an early Beushausenia.Google Scholar
page 350 note 3 1870, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, p. 39, and defined 1875, Geol. Surv. Illinois, vol. vi, p. 530.Google Scholar
page 350 note 4 See Stoliczka, 1871, loc. cit., p. 339.
page 350 note 5 1855, Sedgwick and McCoy, loc. cit., pl. 1k, figs. 1–2.
page 350 note 6 1885, Geol. Surv. State of New York, loc. cit., p. xxxiii, type Sanguinolites arcaeformis Hall, pl. lxv, figs. 7–11, and see numerous figures on pls. lxv, lxvi.Google Scholar
page 350 note 7 1924, loc. cit., p. 380.
page 351 note 1 1885, loc. cit., pl. xliv, fig. 14.
