10 September 2024: Due to technical disruption, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working to restore services and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
In the Geological Magazine for last month (January) I proposed to establish the genus Phlyctænius for the peculiar Coccostean from the Lower Devonian beds of Campbelltown in Canada, named by Whiteaves Coccostens Acadicus. In this paper I propose describing that form more in detail, along with an allied, though at the same time very strongly marked species from the Lower Old Eed Sandstone of Herefordshire, to which on that occasion I also referred.
Read before the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh, 15th January, 1890.
page 55 note 2 Trans. Roy. Soc. Can. vol. vi. sect. iv. 1889, p.93Google Scholar.
page 56 note 1 Op. cit, p. 93, woodcut.
page 57 note 1 Geol. Mag. Dec. III. Vol. VI. Pl. I. Fig. 2Google Scholar.
page 57 note 2 Op. cit. pl. ix. fig. 1.
page 58 note 1 Mr. Wm. Davies seems to have believed in the occurrence of “Placodermi” in the Herefordshire beds, as he labelled some fragments in the British Museum “Pterichthys.” They do not, however, belong to that genus.
