Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:24:45.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—On the Value of the Evidence for the Existence of the Mammoth in Europe in Pre-glacial Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Europe during the Tertiary period was invaded by successive races of animals driven from their head quarters by press of numbers or by famine, or allured by some modification of circumstances that was specially adapted for their well-being, in precisely the same way as it was subsequently invaded by successive races of men. Eocene Mammals were followed by Miocene, and those again by Pliocene, Pliocene by the Pre-glacial division of the Pleistocene, and, finally, the latter by the Post-glacial or Quaternary, in obedience to the same natural laws which compelled the Stone- to vanish away before the Bronze-folk, and the Kelt to yield to the Teuton. The parallel between the conquest of Europe by the ancient mammalia and that by man is most exact. In both cases the conquering race absorbed a greater or less proportion of the conquered. Thus the Hippopotamus major and Rhinoceros hemitæchus of the Pliocenes of Italy lingered on in France and Germany in association with, or, as it were, in a kind of helotage to, the Post-glacial fauna, just as the Kelt still survives in the midst of his Teutonic conquerors in Britain. In both there is the same uncertainty as to the ancient head-quarters of each race, except the last one, from which the present inhabitants of Western Europe are descended.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1868

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 316 note 1 Comptes Rendus, tom. xlvi.Google Scholar

page 317 note 1 Comptes Rendus, tom. xlvi., p. 409.Google Scholar

page 317 note 2 Note sur Deux Têtes de Carnassiers Fossiles Ann. des Sc. Nat. 5 ser. tom viii.Google Scholar

page 317 note 3 Palæontological Memoirs of the late Hugh Falconer. Edit by Dr.Murchison, . Vol.iiGoogle Scholar

page 319 note 1 “My Dear Sir,—I have never found a Mammoth tooth in situ in Pre-glacial beds. There is in my collection what Dr. Falconer regarded as an old type of the Elephas primigenius, but it was a beach specimen, and the matrix upon it decidedly corresponds with that upon a Mammoth tusk dredged up off Yarmouth. I have obtained a Mammoth tooth from a Post-glacial bed near Bacton, and such specimens might be expected to fall upon the beach from beds above the Pre-glacial. The Tichorhine Rhinoceros has not been found io the Norfolk Pre-glacial beds, and I utterly discredit the finding of the Mammoth in them.”—Extract from letter of the Rev. J. Gunn to the writer of this notice, dated 05 2, 1868.Google Scholar