Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:26:29.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—Some Disputed Points in the Crystallisation of the Constituent Minerals of Granite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In writing my little paper on vein-quartz I was particularly anxious not to introduce controversial matter, but to be strictly orthodox throughout. After the paper was published I was much perturbed to find that I had unwittingly come into collision with two incidental remarks in General McMahon's most interesting paper on the Satlej granite, which was the subject of his address to Section C at Belfast. My oversight arose owing to the said remarks being incidental, and no stress having been laid upon their paramount importance.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1903

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 397 note 1 Derivation from felspar I have since then occasionally noticed; but my slides do not seem to contain an indisputable case of derivation from mica.

page 399 note 1 Geol. Rep. on Devon and Corwall, p. 387.

page 399 note 2 Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1900, p. 593 et seq.

page 399 note 3 “Anticipations,” p. 368.

page 401 note 1 Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1877, p. 236.

page 401 note 2 Loc. cit., p. 233.

page 402 note 1 “On Variation in the Critical Point of Carbon Dioxide in Minerals,” etc.: Journal Chemical Society, 1876. Reprint, p. 12.