Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T11:21:11.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—The Work of Prof. Henry Carvill Lewis in Glacial Geology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Warren Upham
Warren Upham
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent notice of the life and work of Prof. Henry Carvill Lewis, whose lamented death occurred in Manchester, July 21st, 1888, in his thirty-fifth year, well indicates the wide range of his scientific labours. He published valuable results of investigations in astronomy, mineralogy and petrology, and especially in glacial geology, the last being based on his exploration of the drift and its terminal moraines in the United States, and later in Ireland, Wales and England. The present article reviews his contributions to our knowledge of these drift formations and of the history of the Ice Age, bringing into comparison and correlation the glacial records of America and Europe. Comprehensive as were Professor Lewis' observations and studies in this field, he was planning yet more thorough and extensive exploration of the drift in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, when he was taken from us.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 1889 , pp. 155 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1889

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 155 note 1 This Magazine, III. Vol. V. pp. 428–430, 09, 1888.Google Scholar A similar but more extended notice, with portrait, appeared in the American Geologist for December, 1888.

page 157 note 1 American Journal of Science, III. vol. xxxv. pp. 401–407, 05, 1888Google Scholar.

page 157 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.. vol. xxx. 1874, pp. 27–42;Google Scholar xxxiv. 1878, pp. 383–397; xxxvi. 1880, pp. 351–5; xxxvii. 1881, pp. 351–69; and xliii. 1887, pp. 73–120; also, Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. I. 1874, pp. 193–197.Google Scholar

page 158 note 1 Nature, vol. x. pp. 25, 26, 05 14, 1874Google Scholar; Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. I. pp. 496–510.Google Scholar Nov. 1874. A similar opinion was held fifty years ago by Mr. James Smith (Researches in Newer Pliocene and Post-Tertiary Geology, pp. 11, 16), though he attributed the drift to debacles instead of glaciation.

page 158 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. vi. 1850, pp. 386–8;Google Scholar xxi. 1865, pp. 219–21.

page 158 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxiv. 1878, pp. 454–7;Google Scholar xxxix. 1883, p. 54. Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. II. 1875, p. 229;Google Scholar Dec. II. Vol. vi. 1879, pp. 166–72.

page 158 note 4 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxv. 1879, p. 810;Google Scholar xxxvi. 1880, p. 663.

page 158 note 5 Geol. Mag. Dec. III. Vol. IV. pp. 515–17, Nov. 1887;Google Scholar Vol. V. p. 430, Sept. 1888.

page 158 note 6 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxvi. 1880, pp. 463–500;Google Scholar Great Ice Age, second ed. pp. 350–365.

page 159 note 1 A. Geikie's Text-Book of Geology, p. 903; Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxii. 1876. pp. 184–190.Google Scholar

page 159 note 2 Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. VI. 1879, p. 283;Google Scholar Third Annual Report of the U.S Geological Survey, p. 297.Google Scholar

page 159 note 3 Geology of New Hampshire, vol. iii. pp. 279–282;Google Scholar Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. VI. 1879, pp. 248–250.Google Scholar

page 159 note 4 American Journal of Science, III. vol. xiii. 1877, pp. 76–79;Google Scholar Great Ice Age, second ed. p. 405.

page 160 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xvii. 1861, pp. 446–456,Google Scholar and 473–5; Great Ice Age. second ed. pp. 372–380.