Article contents
II.—Notes on Some Fossil Bivalved Entomostraca
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
Notes and references accumulating for some years have induced me to offer some remarks on a new fossil Estheria, and on some already known, of Carboniferous, of Permian, and of Triassic age; also a description of some fossil Ostracoda from the Ironstone of Shotover, near Oxford, involving remarks on all the known Wealden species; and lastly notes on some species found in the Purbeck strata of the Subwealden Boring, near Battle, in Sussex.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1878
References
page 100 note 1 Estheria and its congener the Limnadia received much elucidation at the hands of ProfGrube, E., of Breslau, in his memoir “Ueber die Gattungen Estheria und Limnadia,” etc., in the Archir für Naturgeschichte, Jahrgang xxxi. 1865Google Scholar.
page 101 note 1 Estheria Adamsii and E. Peachii were figured and described on the same occasion, loc. cit. Pl. IX. Figs. 1 and 17. E. punctatella had been already added to the list of Carboniferous Estheriæ, in the Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, 1865, pl. i. fig. 3.
page 101 note 2 Geol. Mag. Series II. Vol. III. p. 576.Google Scholar
page 101 note 3 “Die fossilen Thiere aus der Steinkohlenformation von Saarbrücken,” Heft ii.
page 104 note 1 Hampshire is included in the “Hastings Sand” Column, and Kent, Sussex, Hampshire, and Isle of Wight in the “Purbeck” Column of the Table, at page 352, evidently from inadvertence.
page 105 note 1 In the “Catalogue of the Collection of Fossils in the Museum of Practical Geology,” 1865, p. 254, the following are enumerated:—
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20160401053321046-0805:S001675680014645X_eqnU1.gif?pub-status=live)
Some of these names have evidently been adopted from Forbes.
page 106 note 1 Brady, , Crosskey, , and Robertson's, Monogr. Brit. Post-Tertiary Entom., Pal. Soc. 1874, p. 110, etc.Google Scholar
page 106 note 2 “Description des Entomostraces fossiles des Terrains tertiaires de la France et de la Belgique,” Mém. cour. Acad. Roy. Belg., vol. xxiv. 1852; page 47 of the separate memoir.Google Scholar
page 107 note 1 Monogr. Post-Tertiary Entom. 1874, p. 141, pl. 2, fig. 13.
page 107 note 2 We may remark that fig. 25, on the same plate, representing Candona Kotahensis, from the Jurassic beds of India, has almost exactly the outline of the recent Candona lactea.
page 108 note 1 Jones, T. Rupert, Monogr. Tert. Entom., Pal. Soc, 1856, p. 19, pl. 1, figs. 5 and 8Google Scholar: Brady, G. S., Monogr. Rec. Brit. Entom., Trans. Linn. Soc., 1868, p. 383, pl. 25, figs. 1–9Google Scholar: Brady, , Crosskey, , and Robertson, , Monogr. Brit. Post-Tert. Entom., Pal. Soc., 1874, p. 135, pl. 2, figs. 29, 30.Google Scholar
page 108 note 2 Trans. Zool. Soc. vol. v. (1866), p. 368, pl. 58, fig. 9Google Scholar.
- 7
- Cited by